The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Institutional Structuring of Innovation Strategies: Business Systems, Firm Types and Patterns of Technical Change in Different Market Economies
Abstract
Innovation patterns and technological specialization vary considerably between market economies with different institutions because they coordinate economic activities in different ways with different kinds of firms developing contrasting innovation strategies. Six major forms of economic organization, or business systems, with different kinds of firms can be distinguished: fragmented, coordinated industrial district, compartmentalized, collaborative, highly coordinated and state organized. These kinds of business system develop and are reproduced in particular institutional contexts. They are associated with five kinds of innovation strategies: dependent, craft-based responsive, generic, complex and risky, and transformative. These strategies can be distinguished in terms of the following characteristics of innovations: technical and user uncertainty, user differentiation and product quality specialization, organizational competence destruction, use of codified knowledge, and the complexity of the knowledge base. Firms with different kinds of governance structures and organizational capabilities pursue these innovation strategies to varying degrees in different institutional environments. As a result, institutional differences between market economies lead to variations in innovation strategies and patterns of innovative performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Richardson, G. B. (1972) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2230256 · Cited by 2,200
Cited by
Organizations and Societal Economic Inequality: A Review and Way Forward
Bapuji, H., Ertug, G., & Shaw, J. D. (2020) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0029 · Cited by 277
Corporate responsibility: Reflections on context and consequences
Halme, M., Roome, N., & Dobers, P. (2009) · Scandinavian Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2008.12.001 · Cited by 123
Hotho, J. J. (2014) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840613502767 · Cited by 113
DiVito, L., & Ingen-Housz, Z. (2021) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-019-00254-6 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Whitley, R.
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 855-886
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W2139645078
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
