The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Project Networks and Changing Industry Practices Collaborative Content Production in the German Television Industry
Open accessAbstract
Changing industry practices and forms of production organization are the medium and result of co-evolutionary processes of change. The disruptive event of transforming the German TV industry into a dual system triggered a change in content production from in-house to collaborative forms in project networks which are not only highly sensitive to previous and anticipated project practices, but also to industry practices. In turn, the change in the production organization recursively influences the reproduction of industry practices. The co-evolutionary analysis is based on structuration theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
Barley, S. R. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392767 · Cited by 2,315
Cited by
Temporary organizing and permanent contexts
Sydow, J., & Windeler, A. (2020) · Current Sociology · doi:10.1177/0011392120907629 · Cited by 75
Self-citationA routine dynamics lens on the stability-change dilemma in project-based organizations
Bygballe, L. E., Swärd, A., & Vaagaasar, A. L. (2021) · Project Management Journal · doi:10.1177/8756972820986660 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Windeler, A., & Sydow, J.
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-11
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1035-1060
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W1994676022
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
