The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modelling the Firm in its Market and Organizational Environment: Methodologies for Studying Corporate Social Responsibility
Open accessAbstract
The study of corporate social responsibility (CSR) can best be mainstreamed within the wider social science literature if it is defined as firms voluntarily assuming responsibility for their externalities, thereby setting the puzzle of how this can be reconciled with the maximization of shareholder value as the central challenge of the subject. Means of resolving the puzzle require modelling the firm interacting with its environment as both a market actor and as an organization, and in particular through the interaction between these two. Such an approach has no need of a separate concept of ‘stakeholders’. The analysis develops through the firm's relations with actual and potential political action (raising the separate issue of corporate citizenship), and the tastes of consumers, investors and employees—the last raising interesting implications for principal–agent theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits
Friedman, M. (2007) · Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_14 · Cited by 11,529 · cited 3×
“One position was famously articulated by Milton Friedman (1970), who argued, not just that firms had no duties beyond shareholder value maximization, but that they had no mandate to go beyond that and decide wider social goals.”
BackgroundInfluentialA Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance
Carroll, A. B. (1979) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257850 · Cited by 10,480
Cited by
Corporate Social Responsibility and institutional theory: new perspectives on private governance
Brammer, S., Jackson, G., & Matten, D. (2012) · Socio-Economic Review · doi:10.1093/ser/mwr030 · Cited by 1,134
Trade‐offs in corporate sustainability: you can't have your cake and eat it
Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J., & Preuss, L. (2010) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.674 · Cited by 732
Understanding Attributions of Corporate Social Irresponsibility
Lange, D., & Washburn, N. T. (2012) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2010.0522 · Cited by 710
Theory Assessment and Agenda Setting in Political CSR: A Critical Theory Perspective
Scherer, A. G. (2018) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12137 · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Crouch, C.
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1533-1551
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W2129431574
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modelling the Firm in its Market and Organizational Environment: Methodologies for Studying Corporate Social Responsibility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0170840606068255
- The paper
- Crouch, C. (2006). Modelling the Firm in its Market and Organizational Environment: Methodologies for Studying Corporate Social Responsibility. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606068255
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.