Corporate Social Responsibility and institutional theory: new perspectives on private governance
Abstract
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has become a pervasive topic in the business literature, but has largely neglected the role of institutions. This introductory article to the Special Issue of Socio-Economic Review examines the potential contributions of institutional theory to understanding CSR as a mode of governance. This perspective suggests going beyond grounding CSR in the voluntary behaviour of companies, and understanding the larger historical and political determinants of whether and in what forms corporations take on social responsibilities. Historically, the prevailing notion of CSR emerged through the defeat of more institutionalized forms of social solidarity in liberal market economies. Meanwhile, CSR is more tightly linked to formal institutions of stakeholder participation or state intervention in other advanced economies. The tensions between business-driven and multi-stakeholder forms of CSR extend to the transnational level, where the form and meaning of CSR remain highly contested. CSR research and practice thus rest on a basic paradox between a liberal notion of voluntary engagement and a contrary implication of socially binding responsibilities. Institutional theory seems to be a promising avenue to explore how the boundaries between business and society are constructed in different ways, and improve our understanding of the effectiveness of CSR within the wider institutional field of economic governance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Institutional theory allows for a better understanding of the 'diversity and dynamics' of CSR.
“As Brammer et al. (2012: 7) argue, institutional theory allows for a better understanding of the 'diversity and dynamics' of CSR, a point supported by a number of scholars (eg Campbell, 2007; Matten & Moon, 2008).”
From Conceptualising the adoption of sustainable procurement: an institutional theory perspective (2014) · cites this paper as Brammer et al. 2012
Taking an institutional lens widens our approach to the study of a particular area of organisational behavior or performance.
“Moreover, as Brammer et al (2012) point out, taking an institutional lens widens our approach to the study of a particular area of organisational behavior or performance - a point very relevant to sustainable procurement, a highly interdisciplinary area of study, as exemplified by the disciplinary scope of this journal.”
From Conceptualising the adoption of sustainable procurement: an institutional theory perspective (2014) · cites this paper as Brammer et al 2012
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The UN’s Sustainable Development Goals: Can multinational enterprises lead the Decade of Action?
Van Tulder, R., Rodrigues, S. B., Mirza, H., & Sexsmith, K. (2021) · Journal of International Business Policy · doi:10.1057/s42214-020-00095-1 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
CSR ‘sustainability’ practices and firm performance in an emerging economy
Sardana, D., Gupta, N., Kumar, V., & Terziovski, M. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120766 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Human rights and impact assessment: clarifying the connections in practice
Kemp, D., & Vanclay, F. (2013) · Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal · doi:10.1080/14615517.2013.782978 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Roman, A. V. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.014 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
From Taken‐for‐Granted to Explicit Commitment: The Rise of<scp>CSR</scp>in a Corporatist Country
Höllerer, M. A. (2013) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12029 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Corporate social responsibility and labour agency: the case of Nike in Pakistan
Lund-Thomsen, P., & Coe, N. M. (2015) · Journal of Economic Geography · doi:10.1093/jeg/lbt041 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Conceptualising the adoption of sustainable procurement: an institutional theory perspective
Grob, S., & Benn, S. (2014) · Australasian Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1080/14486563.2013.878259 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Social return on investment in the public sector
Vluggen, R., Kuijpers, R., Semeijn, J., & Gelderman, C. J. (2020) · Journal of Public Procurement · doi:10.1108/jopp-06-2018-0023 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
- Authors
- Brammer, S., Jackson, G., & Matten, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
- York University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Jackson, G.
- Venue
- Socio-Economic Review
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-12-15
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-28
- ISSN
- 1475-1461 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-147X
- OpenAlex
- W2023778083
- Cited by
- 1,134
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 82 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 89 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 99 · 2017: 77 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 107.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Socio-Economic Review (publishedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Keywords
- corporate social responsibility, institutional theory, private governance, stakeholder engagement, state intervention, multi-stakeholder governance, economic governance, liberal market economy, social solidarity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review