Cited by 1,134Corporate Social Responsibility ReportingCorporate Social Responsibility and SustainabilityManagement and Organizational Studies

Corporate Social Responsibility and institutional theory: new perspectives on private governance

Brammer, S., Jackson, G., Matten, D.·2012·Socio-Economic Review

Abstract

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has become a pervasive topic in the business literature, but has largely neglected the role of institutions. This introductory article to the Special Issue of Socio-Economic Review examines the potential contributions of institutional theory to understanding CSR as a mode of governance. This perspective suggests going beyond grounding CSR in the voluntary behaviour of companies, and understanding the larger historical and political determinants of whether and in what forms corporations take on social responsibilities. Historically, the prevailing notion of CSR emerged through the defeat of more institutionalized forms of social solidarity in liberal market economies. Meanwhile, CSR is more tightly linked to formal institutions of stakeholder participation or state intervention in other advanced economies. The tensions between business-driven and multi-stakeholder forms of CSR extend to the transnational level, where the form and meaning of CSR remain highly contested. CSR research and practice thus rest on a basic paradox between a liberal notion of voluntary engagement and a contrary implication of socially binding responsibilities. Institutional theory seems to be a promising avenue to explore how the boundaries between business and society are constructed in different ways, and improve our understanding of the effectiveness of CSR within the wider institutional field of economic governance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ser/mwr030

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Institutional theory allows for a better understanding of the 'diversity and dynamics' of CSR.

    “As Brammer et al. (2012: 7) argue, institutional theory allows for a better understanding of the 'diversity and dynamics' of CSR, a point supported by a number of scholars (eg Campbell, 2007; Matten & Moon, 2008).”
  • Taking an institutional lens widens our approach to the study of a particular area of organisational behavior or performance.

    “Moreover, as Brammer et al (2012) point out, taking an institutional lens widens our approach to the study of a particular area of organisational behavior or performance - a point very relevant to sustainable procurement, a highly interdisciplinary area of study, as exemplified by the disciplinary scope of this journal.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brammer, S., Jackson, G., & Matten, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
  • York University (CA)
Corresponding author
Jackson, G.
Venue
Socio-Economic Review
Published
2011-12-15
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
3-28
ISSN
  • 1475-1461 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-147X
OpenAlex
W2023778083
Cited by
1,134
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 82 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 89 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 99 · 2017: 77 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 10
FWCI
107.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Socio-Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
corporate social responsibility, institutional theory, private governance, stakeholder engagement, state intervention, multi-stakeholder governance, economic governance, liberal market economy, social solidarity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review