The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theorizing and Researching the Dark Side of Organization
Open accessAbstract
The paper offers an introduction to research that concerns itself with the ‘dark side’ of organization and attempts to bring theoretical resources from a range of disciplines to bear upon the problem. This stream of research has emerged most visibly since the 1990s, although its concerns can be found in much earlier research. Frustrations with the tendencies of mainstream work to overlook, ignore or suppress difficult ethical, political and ideological issues, which may well mean life or death to some people, has in recent years led to a research that self-identifies its concerns as being with the dark side. We structure our review around key contributions on the dark side of organizational behaviour, mainly in psychology but also including the concept of organizational misbehaviour; the sociology of the dark side, with particular reference to mistakes, misconduct and disaster; and a wider range of critical approaches to the dark side including Marxist, post-Marxist and postcolonial perspectives. We also undertake a review of methodologies for investigating dark side phenomena, and finally introduce the five papers that comprise this special issue.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams
Barker, J. R. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393374 · Cited by 2,305
Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017103 · Cited by 1,690
The dark side of organizations: mistake, misconduct, and disaster.
Vaughan, D. (1999) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.271 · Cited by 1,072
The Dark Side of Transformational Leadership: A Critical Perspective
Tourish, D. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9780203558119 · Cited by 333
The impact of psychological distress on absence from work
Hardy, G. E., Woods, D., & Wall, T. D. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.306 · Cited by 253
Bacharach, S. B., Bamberger, P. A., & Doveh, E. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.155 · Cited by 156
Cited by
Thinking responsibly about responsible AI and ‘the dark side’ of AI
Mikalef, P., Conboy, K., Lundström, J. E., & Popovič, A. (2022) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2022.2026621 · Cited by 435
A Fresh Look at the Dark Side of Contemporary Careers: Toward a Realistic Discourse
Baruch, Y., & Vardi, Y. (2016) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12107 · Cited by 195
Psychometric properties of a scale to measure the dark side of personality
SALESSI, S., & OMAR, A. (2018) · Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) · doi:10.1590/1982-02752018000200005 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Linstead, S., Maréchal, G., & Griffin, R. W.
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 165-188
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W2160665216
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 58.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theorizing and Researching the Dark Side of Organization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0170840613515402
- The paper
- Linstead, S., Maréchal, G., & Griffin, R. W. (2014). Theorizing and Researching the Dark Side of Organization. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613515402
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.