The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Footnotes to Research on Management Innovation
Abstract
Management innovations, also called organizational, administrative, and managerial innovations, are nontechnological innovations that have been conceptualized in contrast to technology-based product and process innovations and pertain to new organizational structures, administrative systems, and management practices. This paper provides a perspective on the state of research on this innovation type. It asks why research on management innovation lags that of technological innovation and compiles five footnotes, each addressing an important aspect of studying innovation in organizations, and, together, they explain conceptual ambiguity and methodological challenges that have hindered research on management innovation. The footnotes also highlight the opportunities that research on management innovation could provide for a better understanding of the influence of innovation on organizational conduct and outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393553 · Cited by 35,728
The Theory of Economic Development
Schumpeter, J., & Backhaus, U. (2006) · The European Heritage in Economics and the Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/0-306-48082-4_3 · Cited by 22,506
(1993) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(93)91697-o · Cited by 18,154
Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171110 · Cited by 16,157
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy
Fukuyama, F., & Schumpeter, J. A. (1997) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20048211 · Cited by 15,264
Valente, T. W. (2003) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.gim.0000061743.67794.c4 · Cited by 13,723
The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing
Arrow, K. J. (1962) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2295952 · Cited by 7,202
Williamson, O. E. (1975) · Cited by 6,810
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy.
Robinson, J., & Schumpeter, J. A. (1943) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2226398 · Cited by 6,529
The Oxford Handbook of Innovation
(2006) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.001.0001 · Cited by 5,922
Cited by
Innovation objectives as determinants of organizational innovations
Meroño-Cerdán, A. L., & López-Nicolás, C. (2017) · Innovation · doi:10.1080/14479338.2016.1276407 · Cited by 42
Asymmetric modeling of organizational innovation
Hervas-Oliver, J.-L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., & Arribas, I. (2015) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.04.005 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Damanpour, F.
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1265-1285
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W2121976970
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 107
- FWCI
- 32.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Footnotes to Research on Management Innovation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0170840614539312
- The paper
- Damanpour, F. (2014). Footnotes to Research on Management Innovation. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614539312
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
