The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Gentle Art of Retroduction: Critical Realism, Cultural Political Economy and Critical Grounded Theory
Abstract
This article, first, proposes critical grounded theory (CGT) as a way to develop systematically an array of methods and theoretical propositions into a coherent critical methodology for organization studies (and beyond). Second, it demonstrates CGT’s usefulness through a case study of competing recovery projects from the Icelandic financial crisis. CGT is developed in engagement with the emerging paradigm of cultural political economy (CPE) and its preferred method of critical discourse analysis (CDA). CPE analyses the evolution of ‘economic imaginaries’ in both their structural/material and semiotic/discursive dimensions. This requires a critical realist, multi-dimensional research strategy which emphasizes ethnographic methods and substantial theoretical and historical work. The proposed methodology of CGT enables a retroductive research process that combines deductive theoretical deskwork with inductive fieldwork enabled by grounded theory tools to analyse organizational process, stability and change.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Belfrage and Hauf (2017) suggested an open and fluid reality analysis, based on the Critical Grounded Theory.”
From Deconstructing the Glaser-Strauss Dilemma: Integrative Discussion about the Grounded Theory in Management (2023) · cites this paper as Belfrage & Hauf, 2017
Citations
Cites
Wagner, H. R., Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2575405 · Cited by 46,525
(2006) · Cited by 18,730
Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428112452151 · Cited by 13,227
Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis
Brink, E., Dellve, L., Hallberg, U. E., Abrahamsson, K. H., Klingberg, G., & Wentz, K. (2006) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being · doi:10.3402/qhw.v1i3.4932 · Cited by 6,913
Burawoy, M. (1998) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1111/0735-2751.00040 · Cited by 2,916
From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not
Suddaby, R. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.22083020 · Cited by 2,859
Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis
Cross, R. (2011) · QMiP Bulletin · doi:10.53841/bpsqmip.2011.1.11.32 · Cited by 2,373
Critical realism: essential readings
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-5017 · Cited by 1,683
Doing Critical Management Research
Alvesson, M. G., & Deetz, S. A. (2000) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781849208918 · Cited by 1,665
Making sense of financialization
van der Zwan, N. (2014) · Socio-Economic Review · doi:10.1093/ser/mwt020 · Cited by 1,434
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Debray R., 1973, Prison writings
- Fleetwood S., 2004, Critical realist applications in organization and management studies
- Gissurarson H. H., 2004, Wall Street Journal, 29, 1
- Glaser B. G., 1992, Emergence vs. forcing: Basics of grounded theory analysis
- Glaser B. G., 1967, The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research
- Jaeggi R., 2014, Alienation
- 10.4337/9781845428907 · DOI
- Krugman P. (2011). A Song of Ice and Ire: Iceland in context. Presented at Conference Iceland’s Recovery: Lessons and Challenges, 27 October, co-hosted by the International Monetary Fund, Central Bank of Iceland and Iceland Ministry of Economic Affairs. Available at: http://www.imf.org/external/np/seminars/eng/2011/isl/index.htm (accessed 10 November 2011).
- Sayer A., 1998, Critical realism: Essential readings, 120
- Stockhammer E., 2008, Competition & Change, 12, 184
- Wade R., 2009, Challenge, 52, 5
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Charmaz, K. (2020) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1077800419879081 · Cited by 248
Conejero, M. C., & MacLennan, M. L. F. (2023) · Organizações & Sociedade · doi:10.1590/1984-92302023v30n0017en · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Belfrage, C., & Hauf, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Belfrage, Claes
- ORCID
- Belfrage, Claes
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-09-25
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 251-271
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W2511869857
- Semantic Scholar
- a1a6db635df4151ecf8a231b0ee5d0e36af0d7c8
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 110 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 24.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organization Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Realism in Sociology
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Keywords
- critical realism, cultural political economy, critical discourse analysis, economic imaginaries, Icelandic financial crisis, critical methodology, organizational change, organizational stability, ethnographic methods
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Gentle Art of Retroduction: Critical Realism, Cultural Political Economy and Critical Grounded Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0170840616663239
- The paper
- Belfrage, C., & Hauf, F. (2017). The Gentle Art of Retroduction: Critical Realism, Cultural Political Economy and Critical Grounded Theory. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616663239