The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Communicative Constitution of Organization, Organizing, and Organizationality
Open accessAbstract
Although the lion’s share of scholarship in management and organization studies conceives of organizations as entities within which communication occurs, “Communication Constitutes Organization” (CCO) scholarship has attracted interest because it makes a productive reversal, that is, by asking how organization happens in communication. Over the past decade, Organization Studies has become the key scholarly outlet for CCO thinking in the management and organization studies field. Accordingly, in this paper we discuss seven articles that have appeared in this journal as evidence of the perspective’s centrality. We first situate CCO theorizing within the linguistic turn, and position CCO with respect to other lines of scholarship underwritten by a rich conception of language and discourse. We examine the varied ways CCO thinking has found organization in communication, locating in the seven articles productive tensions between the process of communication, on the one hand, and organization, organizing, and organizationality, on the other. We contribute to CCO scholarship with reflections on these three theoretical orientations and provide a set of possibilities for its further development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Social Psychology of Organizations.
Hackman, J. R., Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2989929 · Cited by 12,235
(1969) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 10,735
Morgan, G. (1986) · Cited by 5,650
Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge
Knorr Cetina, K. (1999) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674039681 · Cited by 3,956
Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-0887 · Cited by 3,346
THE LOGIC OF CONNECTIVE ACTION: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2012.670661 · Cited by 3,116
On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change
Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. (2002) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.13.5.567.7810 · Cited by 2,718
The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism
Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T., & Meyer, R. (2017) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781526415066 · Cited by 2,186
Handbook of Organization Studies
Hubbell, L., Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C., & Nord, W. R. (1997) · Public Productivity & Management Review · doi:10.2307/3380686 · Cited by 1,983
Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization Theories
Poole, M. S., & van de Ven, A. H. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4308389 · Cited by 1,905
Cited by
Schoeneborn, D., Morsing, M., & Crane, A. (2020) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650319845091 · Cited by 230
Self-citationKolli, S., & Khajeheian, D. (2020) · Contemporary Applications of Actor Network Theory · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-7066-7_12 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Schoeneborn, D., Kuhn, T. R., & Kärreman, D.
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-07-18
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 475-496
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W2884646020
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 103
- FWCI
- 28.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Communicative Constitution of Organization, Organizing, and Organizationality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0170840618782284
- The paper
- Schoeneborn, D., Kuhn, T. R., & Kärreman, D. (2019). The Communicative Constitution of Organization, Organizing, and Organizationality. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618782284
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.