Formative Perspectives on the Relation Between CSR Communication and CSR Practices: Pathways for Walking, Talking, and T(w)alking
Open accessAbstract
Within the burgeoning corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication literature, the question of the relationship between CSR practices and CSR communication (or between “walk” and “talk”) has been a central concern. Recently, we observe a growing interest in formative views on the relation between CSR communication and practices, that is, works which ascribe to communication a constitutive role in creating, maintaining, and transforming CSR practices. This article provides an overview of the heterogeneous landscape of formative views on CSR communication scholarship. More specifically, we distinguish between three variants of such formative views: walking-to-talk, talking-to-walk, and t(w)alking. These three orientations differ primarily regarding the temporal dynamics that they ascribe to the relation between CSR communication and practices and regarding the object that is formed through communication. This new typology helps systematize the emerging field of research on CSR communication, and we use it as a compass to provide directions for future research in this area.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Austin, J. L. (1975) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 · Cited by 21,496 · see citing works
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718 · see citing works
Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication
Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x · Cited by 2,633 · see citing works
Haack, P., Schoeneborn, D., & Wickert, C. (2012) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840612443630 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Self-citationTranscending transmission: Towards a constitutive perspective on CSR communication
Schoeneborn, D., & Trittin, H. (2013) · Corporate Communications: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13563281311319481 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Self-citationLicense to critique: A communication perspective on sustainability standards
Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2017) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.1017/beq.2016.66 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Timely hypocrisy? Hypocrisy temporalities in CSR communication
Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.020 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Schoeneborn, D., Morsing, M., & Crane, A.
- Affiliations
- Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE)
- Stockholm School of Economics (SE)
- University of Bath (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Schoeneborn, Dennis
- Venue
- Business & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-05-07
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-33
- ISSN
- 0007-6503 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4205
- OpenAlex
- W2944772486
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 34.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Business & Society (publishedVersion)
- Pure (University of Bath) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Multilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Copenhagen Business School
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
- Keywords
- CSR communication, CSR practices, temporal dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review