Cited by 230Corporate Social Responsibility ReportingCorporate Social Responsibility and SustainabilityPublic Relations and Crisis Communication

Formative Perspectives on the Relation Between CSR Communication and CSR Practices: Pathways for Walking, Talking, and T(w)alking

Open access
Schoeneborn, Dennis, Morsing, Mette, Crane, Andrew·2020·Business & Society

Abstract

Within the burgeoning corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication literature, the question of the relationship between CSR practices and CSR communication (or between “walk” and “talk”) has been a central concern. Recently, we observe a growing interest in formative views on the relation between CSR communication and practices, that is, works which ascribe to communication a constitutive role in creating, maintaining, and transforming CSR practices. This article provides an overview of the heterogeneous landscape of formative views on CSR communication scholarship. More specifically, we distinguish between three variants of such formative views: walking-to-talk, talking-to-walk, and t(w)alking. These three orientations differ primarily regarding the temporal dynamics that they ascribe to the relation between CSR communication and practices and regarding the object that is formed through communication. This new typology helps systematize the emerging field of research on CSR communication, and we use it as a compass to provide directions for future research in this area.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0007650319845091

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schoeneborn, D., Morsing, M., & Crane, A.
Affiliations
  • Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE)
  • Stockholm School of Economics (SE)
  • University of Bath (GB)
Corresponding author
Schoeneborn, Dennis
Venue
Business & Society
Published
2019-05-07
Volume
59
Issue
1
Pages
5-33
ISSN
  • 0007-6503 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4205
OpenAlex
W2944772486
Cited by
230
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
34.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Business & Society (publishedVersion)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Multilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Copenhagen Business School
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Keywords
CSR communication, CSR practices, temporal dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review