The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Paradoxical Thinking and Change in the Frames of Reference
Abstract
Different types of mental frames of reference among employees in a producers' cooperative are described. Characterizing the employee this way produces a pic ture of the way in which each employee processes information that, in a given situation, enables him or her to identify probiems and solutions. These different frames of reference are assumed to have an impact on the actions taken by these individuals. Furthermore, such actions are assumed to be connected with actions in the organization. Some of the employees occasionally display unexpected beha viour that cannot be explained by the way they have previously interpreted their situation. They experience a paradoxical situation in the organization, during which previous frames of references (or parts of them) are 'deframed' and devoid of meaning, because they hecome involved in discussions on a different, unknown level. Some of these employees discover that the new categories are socially constructed, enabling them to pursue new ways of understanding the environ ment, and to act accordingly. This paper describes situations in which this process is likely to take place and how it may or may not facilitate organizational change.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Traditional marketing draws on this line of reasoning by ignoring or suppressing tension and focusing on customer issues as the single most important criterion for solving problems.”
From Stakeholder marketing: theoretical foundations and required capabilities (2015) · cites this paper as Westenholz 1993
Citations
Cites
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113
Paradoxes of group life: Understanding conflict, paralysis, and movement in group dynamics.
Smith, K. K., & Berg, D. N. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 393
Organizational paradox and transformation.
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (1988) · Cited by 317
Westenholz, A. (1991) · Economic and Industrial Democracy · doi:10.1177/0143831x91122003 · Cited by 8
Self-citationRasmussen, T. A. (2011) · VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) · Cited by 3
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Bartunek, J.M. 1988 'The dynamics of personal and organizational reframing' in Para-do.r and transformation. Toward a theory of change in organization and management. R. E. Quinn and K. S. Cameron (eds.), 137-62. Cambridge, Mass. Ballinger.
- Christensen, S., 1983, Organisationskulturer
- Jameson, F. 1985 'Postmodernism and consumer society' in Postmodern culture. H. Foster (ed.), 111-125. London and Sydney: Pluto Press.
- March, J.C., 1976, Ambiguity and choice in organization
- Morgan, G., 1986, Images of organization
- Quinn. R.E., 1988, Beyond rutional management. Mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance
- Thyssen, O., 1988, Paradigna, 2, 48
- Van de Ven, A.H., and M. Scott Poole 1988 'Paradoxical requirements for a theory of change' in Paradox and transformation. Toward a theory of change in organization and management. R. E. Quinn and K. S. Cameron (eds.), 19-63. Cambridge, Mass. Ballinger.
- Westenholz, A., 1982, Information. Virksomhedsbcskrivelse nr. 3 fra MAREV-Projcktct. Institute for Organization and Industrial Sociology
- Westenholz, A., Paper presented at the 8th SCOS Conference 'Restructuring Organizational Culture — Concepts, Methods and Data', Copenhagen. 26-28 June, 1991
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide
Lewis, M. W. (2000) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2000.3707712 · Cited by 2,562
Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Notes from a Trip Down Memory Lane
Walsh, J. P. (1995) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.6.3.280 · Cited by 2,275
Organizational Change and Managerial Sensemaking: Working Through Paradox
Lüscher, L. S., & Lewis, M. W. (2008) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2008.31767217 · Cited by 1,342
Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward
Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. K. (2016) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1162422 · Cited by 1,385
Managing Social-Business Tensions: A Review and Research Agenda for Social Enterprise
Smith, W. K., Gonin, M., & Besharov, M. H.-P. (2013) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.5840/beq201323327 · Cited by 1,010
Metadata
- Authors
- Westenholz, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Westenholz, Ann
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-58
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W2159415906
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 5.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organization Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Management and Change
- Keywords
- paradoxical thinking, organizational change, employee behavior, social construction of categories, information processing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review