The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
No Joking Matter: Discursive Struggle in the Canadian Refugee System
Open accessAbstract
Organizations often engage in discursive struggle as they attempt to shape and manage the institutional field of which they are a part. This struggle is influenced by broader discourses at the societal level that enable and constrain discursive activity within the institutional field. We investigate this relationship by combining a study of political cartoons, as indicators of the broader societal discourse around immigration, with a case study of the Canadian refugee system, a complex institutional field. Our analysis reveals the complex intertextual and interdiscursive relations that characterize and surround institutional fields, and shows how discursive struggle in the refugee determination system is shaped by, and shapes, broader societal discourses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095101 · Cited by 38,435
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (2004) · Advances in Strategic Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17011-1 · Cited by 25,802
Fee, D., & Fairclough, N. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074659 · Cited by 11,611
Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics
Mouffe, C., & Laclau, E. (1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 9,303
Powers, C. H., & Giddens, A. (1988) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2579442 · Cited by 8,828
The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis.
Andrews, A. O., Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393344 · Cited by 8,261
Institutions and organizations
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1848 · Cited by 8,003
Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays
Althusser, L., & Brewster, B. R. (1971) · Cited by 7,969
The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis
Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (1991) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226185941.001.0001 · Cited by 7,617
Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity
Rorty, R. (1989) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804397 · Cited by 6,740
Cited by
Discourse and Collaboration: The Role of Conversations and Collective Identity
Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Grant, D. (2005) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2005.15281426 · Cited by 698
Self-citationOrganizational Discourse: Domains, Debates, and Directions
Phillips, N., & Oswick, C. (2012) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.1080/19416520.2012.681558 · Cited by 261
Self-citationBen-Slimane, K., Justo, R., & Khelil, N. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-020-04601-6 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Hardy, C., & Phillips, N.
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-24
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W2149302562
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 8.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: No Joking Matter: Discursive Struggle in the Canadian Refugee System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0170840699201001
- The paper
- Hardy, C., & Phillips, N. (1999). No Joking Matter: Discursive Struggle in the Canadian Refugee System. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840699201001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
