Cited by 11,611Foucault, Power, and EthicsCultural and political discourse analysisLinguistics and Discourse Analysis

Discourse and social change

Fee, Dwight, Fairclough, Norman·1993·Contemporary Sociology

Abstract

Approaches to discourse analysis Michel Foucault and analysis of discourse a social theory of discourse intertextuality text analysis - constructing social relations and the self, constructing social reality discourse and social change in contemporary society doing discourse analysis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2074659

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fee, D., & Fairclough, N.
Venue
Contemporary Sociology
Published
1993-09
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
732
ISSN
0094-3061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007161913
Cited by
11,611
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 215 · 2024: 427 · 2023: 563 · 2022: 519 · 2021: 643 · 2020: 729 · 2019: 611 · 2018: 580 · 2017: 620 · 2016: 543 · 2015: 642 · 2014: 613 · 2013: 528 · 2012: 532
FWCI
217.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Foucault, Power, and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Cultural and political discourse analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
Keywords
discourse analysis, social change, Michel Foucault, intertextuality, text analysis, interpersonal relationships, self, social reality, contemporary society

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review