Military Service, Race, and the Transition to Marriage and Cohabitation
Abstract
Using data from the 1979 National Longitudinal Study of Youth, the author investigates the relationship between military service and the transition to the first intimate union. The author argues that active-duty military service promotes marriage over cohabitation. The results are consistent with this argument, showing that active-duty members of the military are much more likely to choose marriage over cohabitation compared to reserve-duty service members, veterans, and comparable civilians. These results are particularly strong for Black men, indicating a possible relationship between working in a largely race-neutral environment and the choice of first intimate union.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research on military enlistment indicates that it has positive effects on family formation and stability.
“Research on military enlistment indicates that it has positive effects on family formation and stability.”
From Reducing Racial Inequities in Health: Using What We Already Know to Take Action (2019) · cites this paper as [39]
Active duty military service promotes marriage over cohabitation, increases the likelihood of first marriage, and leads to greater stability of marriage, and all of these effects were greater for blacks than for whites.
“active duty military service promotes marriage over cohabitation, increases the likelihood of first marriage, and leads to greater stability of marriage and all of these effects were greater for blacks than for whites [37,38,39].”
From Reducing Racial Inequities in Health: Using What We Already Know to Take Action (2019) · cites this paper as [39]
Cites
Mass imprisonment and the life course: Race and class inequality in U.S. incarceration
Pettit, B., & Western, B. (2004) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240406900201 · Cited by 1,499 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Miles to Go before We Sleep: Racial Inequities in Health
Williams, D. R. (2012) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.1177/0022146512455804 · Cited by 507 · see citing works
Reducing Racial Inequities in Health: Using What We Already Know to Take Action
Williams, D. R., & Cooper, L. A. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16040606 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Racism and Health II: A Needed Research Agenda for Effective Interventions
Williams, D. R., & Mohammed, S. A. (2013) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764213487341 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
- Authors
- Teachman, J.
- Affiliations
- Western Washington University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Teachman, Jay
- Venue
- Journal of Family Issues
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-05-07
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1433-1454
- ISSN
- 0192-513X (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5481
- OpenAlex
- W2104012767
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Family Issues (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Family Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
- Keywords
- military service, marriage, cohabitation, transition to marriage, race, Black men, veterans, National Longitudinal Survey of Youth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
