CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 16Work-Family Balance ChallengesFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsWorkaholism, burnout, and well-being

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Parent and Child Experiences of Parental Work–Family Conflict and Satisfaction with Work and Family

Morr Loftus, Mary Claire, Droser, Veronica A.·2020·Journal of Family Issues
DOI 10.1177/0192513x19895043
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between parent and young adult child perceptions of parental work–family conflict and work and family satisfaction. Data were collected from 112 parent–child dyads, and children perceived parents to experience significantly more strain-based work–family conflict than parents reported. Parent and child did not differ in ratings of five other dimensions of parent’s work–family and family–work conflict. Parent and child ratings of the parent’s experience of all three dimensions of work–family conflict and one of three dimensions of family–work conflict were positively correlated. Four actor–partner interdependence models using multilevel modeling tested dyadic effects of work–family or family–work conflict on work or family satisfaction. Negative actor effects were found for behavior-based work–family and family–work conflict and for strain-based family–work conflict on family satisfaction. Negative actor effects existed for behavior-based work–family and family–work conflict on work satisfaction, and behavior-based work–family conflict also had a negative partner effect on work satisfaction.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0192513x19895043

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 10.1037//0021-9010.81.4.411 · DOI
  2. 10.1037//1076-8998.5.2.278 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.socscimen.2017.10.017 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/job.4030080106 · DOI
  5. 10.2307/258214 · DOI
  6. Kenny D. A., Kashy D. A., Cook W. L. (2008). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  7. 10.1111/pere/12198 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.adohealth.2015.02.014 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2005.tb00866.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 16

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Morr Loftus, M. C., & Droser, V. A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Communication Studies, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Family Issues
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2020-01-12
Volume
41
Issue
9
Pages
1649-1673
ISSN
  • 0192-513X (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5481
DOI
10.1177/0192513x19895043
OpenAlex
W3000458941
Cited by
16
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Family Issues (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
Keywords
work-family conflict, family-work conflict, job satisfaction, family satisfaction, parent-child dyads, young adult children, parental attitudes, strain-based conflict, behavior-based conflict, actor-partner interdependence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review