The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vaginal Cytology of the Laboratory Rat and Mouse: Review and Criteria for the Staging of the Estrous Cycle Using Stained Vaginal Smears
Open accessAbstract
Microscopic evaluation of the types of cells present in vaginal smears has long been used to document the stages of the estrous cycle in laboratory rats and mice and as an index of the functional status of the hypothalamic–pituitary–ovarian axis. The estrous cycle is generally divided into the four stages of proestrus, estrus, metestrus, and diestrus. On cytological evaluation, these stages are defined by the absence, presence, or proportion of 4 basic cell types as well as by the cell density and arrangement of the cells on the slide. Multiple references regarding the cytology of the rat and mouse estrous cycle are available. Many contemporary references and studies, however, have relatively abbreviated definitions of the stages, are in reference to direct wet mount preparations, or lack comprehensive illustrations. This has led to ambiguity and, in some cases, a loss of appreciation for the encountered nuances of dividing a steadily moving cycle into 4 stages. The aim of this review is to provide a detailed description, discussion, and illustration of vaginal cytology of the rat and mouse estrous cycle as it appears on smears stained with metachromatic stains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nelson, J. F., Felicio, L. S., Osterburg, H. H., & Finch, C. E. (1981) · Biology of Reproduction · doi:10.1095/biolreprod24.4.784 · Cited by 223 · cited 3×
“Many factors influence cycle length including light, age, temperature, noise, nutrition, stress, and social relationships (Li and Davis 2007; Nelson et al. 1981; Campbell, Ryan, and Schwartz 1976; Campbell and Schwartz 1980; Nelson et al. 1982; Whitten 1956; Goldman, Murr, and Cooper 2007).”
Background
Cited by
Staging of the estrous cycle and induction of estrus in experimental rodents: an update
Ajayi, A. F., & Akhigbe, R. E. (2020) · Fertility Research and Practice · doi:10.1186/s40738-020-00074-3 · Cited by 561
Evaluation of inflammation and follicle depletion during ovarian ageing in mice
Lliberos, C., Liew, S. H., Zareie, P., La Gruta, N. L., Mansell, A., & Hutt, K. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-79488-4 · Cited by 247
Touch neurons underlying dopaminergic pleasurable touch and sexual receptivity
Elias, L. J., Succi, I. K., Schaffler, M. D., Foster, W., Gradwell, M. A., Bohic, M., Fushiki, A., Upadhyay, A., Ejoh, L. L., Schwark, R., et al. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.12.034 · Cited by 85
Increased cellular senescence in doxorubicin-induced murine ovarian injury: effect of senolytics
Gao, Y., Wu, T., Tang, X., Wen, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., & Wang, S. (2023) · GeroScience · doi:10.1007/s11357-023-00728-2 · Cited by 56
Hyer, M. M., Shaw, G. A., Goswamee, P., Dyer, S. K., Burns, C. M., Soriano, E., Sanchez, C. S., Rowson, S. A., McQuiston, A. R., & Neigh, G. N. (2021) · Neurobiology of Stress · doi:10.1016/j.ynstr.2021.100303 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Cora, M. C., Kooistra, L., & Travlos, G.
- Venue
- Toxicologic Pathology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-03-03
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 776-793
- ISSN
- 0192-6233 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2096022216
- Cited by
- 943
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vaginal Cytology of the Laboratory Rat and Mouse: Review and Criteria for the Staging of the Estrous Cycle Using Stained Vaginal Smears. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0192623315570339
- The paper
- Cora, M. C., Kooistra, L., & Travlos, G. (2015). Vaginal Cytology of the Laboratory Rat and Mouse: Review and Criteria for the Staging of the Estrous Cycle Using Stained Vaginal Smears. Toxicologic Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623315570339
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.