Cited by 30Policing Practices and PerceptionsCrime Patterns and InterventionsCriminal Justice and Penology

The Uses and Impacts of Mobile Computing Technology in Hot Spots Policing

Koper, Christopher S., Lum, Cynthia, Hibdon, Julie·2015·Evaluation Review

Abstract

Background: Recent technological advances have much potential for improving police performance, but there has been little research testing whether they have made police more effective in reducing crime. Objective: To study the uses and crime control impacts of mobile computing technology in the context of geographically focused “hot spots” patrols. Research Design: An experiment was conducted using 18 crime hot spots in a suburban jurisdiction. Nine of these locations were randomly selected to receive additional patrols over 11 weeks. Researchers studied officers’ use of mobile information technology (IT) during the patrols using activity logs and interviews. Nonrandomized subgroup and multivariate analyses were employed to determine if and how the effects of the patrols varied based on these patterns. Results: Officers used mobile computing technology primarily for surveillance and enforcement (e.g., checking automobile license plates and running checks on people during traffic stops and field interviews), and they noted both advantages and disadvantages to its use. Officers did not often use technology for strategic problem-solving and crime prevention. Given sufficient (but modest) dosages, the extra patrols reduced crime at the hot spots, but this effect was smaller in places where officers made greater use of technology. Conclusions: Basic applications of mobile computing may have little if any direct, measurable impact on officers’ ability to reduce crime in the field. Greater training and emphasis on strategic uses of IT for problem-solving and crime prevention, and greater attention to its behavioral effects on officers, might enhance its application for crime reduction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0193841x16634482

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For the Mobile Computing Technology at Crime Hot Spots in a Suburban County study (Koper et al., 2015), limited resources led to modest treatment dosage.

    “Limited resources led to modest treatment dosage; officers did not use technology in anticipated ways”

    From Hot spots policing of small geographic areas effects on crime (2019) · cites this paper as Koper et al. (2015)

  • For the Mobile Computing Technology at Crime Hot Spots in a Suburban County study (Koper et al., 2015), officers did not use the technology in anticipated ways.

    “Limited resources led to modest treatment dosage; officers did not use technology in anticipated ways”

    From Hot spots policing of small geographic areas effects on crime (2019) · cites this paper as Koper et al. (2015)

  • In the mobile computing in suburban hot spots randomized experiment, there were lower levels of police presence in treatment areas than anticipated.

    “lower levels of police presence in treatment areas than anticipated in the Dallas (Weisburd et al., 2015) and mobile computing in suburban hot spots (Koper et al., 2015) randomized experiments”

    From Hot spots policing of small geographic areas effects on crime (2019) · cites this paper as Koper et al., 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koper, C. S., Lum, C., & Hibdon, J.
Affiliations
  • George Mason University (US)
  • Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
Corresponding author
Koper, Christopher S.
Venue
Evaluation Review
Published
2015-12
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
587-624
ISSN
  • 0145-4692 (ISSN-L)
  • 0193-841X
  • 1552-3926
OpenAlex
W2333597686
Cited by
30
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
6.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Evaluation Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
police patrol, crime hotspots, hot spot policing, crime reduction, police information technology, police behavior, traffic stops, police training, problem-solving policing, crime prevention
MeSH terms
Crime, Female, Humans, Male, Social Control, Formal, Program Evaluation, Police, Law Enforcement, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review