Cited by 81Biofield Effects and BiophysicsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Therapeutic Touch and Agitation in Individuals With Alzheimer's Disease

Hawranik, Pamela, Johnston, Pat, Deatrich, Judith·2008·Western Journal of Nursing Research

Abstract

Limited effective strategies exist to alleviate or treat disruptive behaviors in people with Alzheimer's disease. Fifty-one residents of a long-term care facility with Alzheimer's disease were randomly assigned to one of three intervention groups. A multiple time series, blinded, experimental design was used to compare the effectiveness of therapeutic touch, simulated therapeutic touch, and usual care on disruptive behavior. Three forms of disruptive behavior comprised the dependent variables: physical aggression, physical nonaggression, and verbal agitation. Physical nonaggressive behaviors decreased significantly in those residents who received therapeutic touch compared with those who received the simulated version and the usual care. No significant differences in physically aggressive and verbally agitated behaviors were observed across the three study groups. The study provided preliminary evidence for the potential for therapeutic touch in dealing with agitated behaviors by people with dementia. Researchers and practitioners must consider a broad array of strategies to deal with these behaviors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0193945907305126

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The findings are in line with the need-driven, dementia-compromised behaviour theory of Algase et al and the hypothesis of Kitwood & Bredin that behaviours arise from need and occur when care is task-driven not person-centred.

    “This is in line with the need-driven, dementia-compromised behaviour theory of Algase et al , 54 and the hypothesis of Kitwood & Bredin that behaviours arise from need and occur when care is task-driven not personcentred (relevant to all neuropsychiatric symptoms). 55”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hawranik, P., Johnston, P., & Deatrich, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • Self-Employed
  • Health Sciences Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Hawranik, Pamela
Venue
Western Journal of Nursing Research
Published
2007-09-25
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
417-434
ISSN
  • 0193-9459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8456
OpenAlex
W2136366257
Cited by
81
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Western Journal of Nursing Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biofield Effects and Biophysics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
therapeutic touch, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, agitation, disruptive behavior, physical aggression, verbal agitation, long-term care residents
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Double-Blind Method, Female, Geriatric Nursing, Humans, Male, Mental Status Schedule, Nursing Assessment, Psychomotor Agitation, Severity of Illness Index, Clinical Nursing Research, Nursing Evaluation Research, Geriatric Assessment, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Incidence, Multivariate Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Holistic Nursing, Therapeutic Touch

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review