Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 7

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consumers: The Commodity Product of Interactive Commercial Television, or, Is Dallas Smythe’s Thesis More Germane Than Ever?

McGuigan, Lee·2012·Journal of Communication Inquiry

Abstract

This article tests Dallas Smythe’s thesis of the audience commodity against emergent marketing paradigms and commercial models organized around interactive television. Television technologies, including various internet-connected content delivery platforms, increasingly combine the technical and administrative infrastructure to support direct conversion of viewers into consumers of the products displayed in advertisements and programs. Through a broad reading of the audience commodity it is suggested herein that, contrary to most appraisals, Smythe recognized audiences as both economic products and social products—people living as producers and consumers in capitalism. Smythe’s thesis has particular currency in relation to an interactive television storefront because the essence of the audience commodity resides in the capacity of viewers to consume branded goods and services. This argument is ever more salient as ongoing developments in database marketing and electronic commerce illustrate that advertiser-supported television manufactures consumers as economic and social products within a nearly ubiquitous digitized marketplace.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0196859912459756

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. Andrejevic M., 2004, Reality TV: The work of being watched, 10.5771/9780585482903 · DOI
  2. Andrejevic M., 2009, Television studies after TV: Understanding television in the post-broadcast era, 31
  3. Arango T., 2008, The New York Times, C1
  4. Artz L., 2008, Democratic Communiqué, 22, 60
  5. 10.3138/9781442672154 · DOI
  6. Bauman Z., 2007, Consuming life
  7. Bermejo F., 2007, The Internet audience: Constitution and measurement
  8. 10.1177/1461444808099579 · DOI
  9. 10.1177/0163443711404463 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1023/A:1009649402461 · DOI
  11. 10.3138/jcs.29.2.111 · DOI
  12. 10.1057/9780230582996 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/10496490903574013 · DOI
  14. Elmer G., 2004, Profiling machines: Mapping the personal information economy
  15. 10.1177/0163443709350375 · DOI
  16. Gambetti R. C., 2010, International Journal of Marketing Research, 52, 826
  17. Harvey D., 2006, Limits to capital
  18. Hesmondhalgh D., 2010, Ephemera, 10, 267
  19. Jaffe J., 2005, Life after the 30-second spot
  20. Jhally S., 1990, The codes of advertising: Fetishism and the political economy of meaning in the consumer society
  21. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1986.tb01442.x · DOI · Paper page
  22. Kang H., 2011, tripleC–Cognition, Communication, Co-Operation, 11, 141
  23. 10.1080/19187033.1986.11675585 · DOI
  24. 10.1177/0163443710394902 · DOI
  25. Leiss W., 1990, Social communication in advertising: Persons, products and images of well-being
  26. Livant B., 1979, Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory, 3, 91
  27. Lotz A., 2007, The television will be revolutionized
  28. Manzerolle V., 2010, Ephemera, 10, 455
  29. 10.1080/15252019.2010.10722170 · DOI
  30. Marx K., 1973, Grundrisse
  31. Mattelart A., 1991, Advertising international: The privatization of public space
  32. Maxwell R., 1991, Journal of Film and Video, 43, 29
  33. 10.1080/15295038409360032 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1080/15295038609366675 · DOI
  35. Meehan E. R., 1993, Illuminating the blindspots: Essays honouring Dallas W. Smythe, 378
  36. Meehan E. R., 2000, Consuming audiences? Production and reception in media research, 71
  37. 10.4135/9781446279946 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1080/14241270109389949 · DOI
  39. Napoli P. M., 2003, Audience economics: Media institutions and the audience marketplace
  40. 10.1177/0163443710361658 · DOI
  41. Napoli P. M., 2011, Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences
  42. Neff J., 2011, Advertising Age, 82, 18
  43. 10.1080/10350330500310145 · DOI
  44. Slater D., 1997, Consumer culture and modernity
  45. 10.1086/266500 · DOI
  46. Smythe D. W., 1977, Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory, 1, 1
  47. Smythe D. W., 1981, Dependency road: Communications, capitalism, consciousness, and Canada
  48. Smythe D. W., 1994, Counterclockwise: Perspectives on communication, 230
  49. Spurgeon C., 2008, Advertising and new media
  50. Tinic S., 2006, The new politics of surveillance and visibility, 308
  51. 10.7208/chicago/9780226817514.001.0001 · DOI
  52. Turow J., 2005, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 597, 121
  53. Turow J., 2006, Niche envy: Marketing discrimination in the digital age
  54. 10.1207/s15506878jobem4604_1 · DOI
  55. Vollmer C., 2008, Always on: Advertising, marketing, and media in an era of consumer control
  56. 10.1177/009207002236909 · DOI
  57. 10.4324/9780203450277 · DOI

Cited by

See all 7

Metadata

Authors
McGuigan, L.
Affiliations
Western University, Ontario, Canada
Venue
Journal of Communication Inquiry
Published
2012-09-17
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
288-304
ISSN
  • 0196-8599
  • 1552-4612
Cited by
7
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consumers: The Commodity Product of Interactive Commercial Television, or, Is Dallas Smythe’s Thesis More Germane Than Ever? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0196859912459756
The paper
McGuigan, L. (2012). Consumers: The Commodity Product of Interactive Commercial Television, or, Is Dallas Smythe’s Thesis More Germane Than Ever? Journal of Communication Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859912459756

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.