Cited by 43Migration, Refugees, and IntegrationRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Immigrants’ Experiences of Everyday Discrimination in Canada: Unpacking the Contributions of Assimilation, Race, and Early Socialization

Vang, Zoua M., Chang, Yvonne·2019·International Migration Review

Abstract

We examined perceptions of everyday discrimination among immigrants in Canada and in comparison to native-born Canadians using data from the 2013 Canadian Community Health Survey. We find that recent immigrants report less discrimination than native-born Canadians, ceteris paribus. Recent immigrants also report less discrimination than their fellow immigrants who had been residing in Canada for much longer durations. There were trivial differences in perceptions of everyday discrimination between native-born Canadians and midway and established immigrants, all else being equal. Additional analysis suggests that differences in age at arrival and associated early socialization experiences might explain variations in immigrants’ perceived discrimination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0197918318764871

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Vang & Chang (2019) find that immigrants who arrived in Canada as children reported markedly higher levels of perceived discrimination than those who arrived at an older age.

    “In particular, in line with the hypothesis that immigrants who attended Canadian schools as children would be more sensitive to unequal treatment and attribute it to discrimination, the authors find that immigrants who arrived in Canada as children reported markedly higher levels of perceived discrimination than those who arrived in Canada at an older age.”

    From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as Vang & Chang 2019

  • Vang & Chang (2019) find that recent immigrants report less perceived discrimination than immigrants who have been living in Canada for a longer period of time.

    “Similarly, in examining perceptions of everyday discrimination among immigrants in Canada, Vang & Chang (2019) find that recent immigrants report less perceived discrimination than immigrants who have been living in Canada for a longer period of time.”

    From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as Vang & Chang 2019

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 66 · Cited by 43

Authors
Vang, Z. M., & Chang, Y.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Vang, Zoua M.
Venue
International Migration Review
Published
2018-05-29
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
602-631
ISSN
  • 0197-9183 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-7379
OpenAlex
W2805092823
Cited by
43
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2
FWCI
7.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Migration Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
everyday discrimination, immigrants, assimilation, race, early socialization, age at arrival, perceived discrimination, Canada

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review