Cited by 18Sleep and related disordersPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsSleep and Wakefulness Research

Zolpidem for Insomnia: A Double-Edged Sword. A Systematic Literature Review on Zolpidem-Induced Complex Sleep Behaviors

Open access
Mittal, Niti, Mittal, Rakesh, Gupta, M. C.·2021·Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Being a nonbenzodiazepine, zolpidem is believed to have a favorable side-effect profile and is widely prescribed for insomnia. However, in the past few years, numerous neuropsychiatric adverse reactions, particularly complex sleep behaviors (CSBs), have been reported with zolpidem. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of zolpidem-associated CSBs. DATA SOURCES: An electronic search was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane database of systematic reviews to extract relevant articles till July 2020. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Any type of literature article (case report, case series, and observational or interventional study) reporting CSBs associated with zolpidem. RESULTS: In this review, we present aggregate summarized data from 148 patients presenting with zolpidem-induced CSBs (79 patients from 23 case reports and 5 case series; 69 patients out of 1454 taking zolpidem [4.7%] from three observational clinical studies). Various types of CSBs associated with zolpidem were reported, most common being sleepwalking/somnambulism and sleep-related eating disorder. On causality assessment, around 88% of cases were found to have a probable association with zolpidem. LIMITATIONS: Extraction of data from observational studies and spontaneous reports, due to nonavailability of any randomized controlled trials relevant to the study objective. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATION OF KEY FINDINGS: Zolpidem-induced CSBs, although not very common, may develop when the drug is used at therapeutic doses for insomnia. Doctors need to be alert to monitor such adverse effects of zolpidem and exercise caution while prescribing it.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0253717621992372

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With increased Z-drug use, serious adverse effects have been identified, including delirium, sleep-related eating disorder, amnesia, and complex behaviors such as sleep-driving; these effects may occur at therapeutic doses and are intensified by alcohol or other sedatives.

    “With increased Z-drug use, a range of serious adverse effects has been identified, including delirium, sleep-related eating disorder, amnesia, and complex behaviors such as sleep-driving; these effects may occur at therapeutic doses, and they are intensified by alcohol or other sedatives.”

    From Z-drug abuse and dependence: Clinical guideline of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology for diagnosis and management (2025) · cites this paper as [12]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [15]The modified Newcastle Ottawa scale for cross sectional studies https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?type=supplementary&id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0136065.s004. Accessed 11 26, 2020. · DOI
  2. [44]Schenck C, Connoy D, Castellanos M,. zolpidem induced amnestic sleep-related eating disorder in 19 patients. Sleep, 2005; 28: A259 Abstract supplement.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mittal, N., Mittal, R., & Gupta, M. C.
Affiliations
Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Corresponding author
Mittal, Niti
Venue
Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine
Published
2021-03-09
Volume
43
Issue
5
Pages
373-381
ISSN
  • 0253-7176 (ISSN-L)
  • 0975-1564
OpenAlex
W3133584103
Cited by
18
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
zolpidem, insomnia, sleepwalking, sleep-related eating disorder, adverse drug reactions, non-benzodiazepine hypnotics, drug safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review