The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Solutions, exclusion and influence: Exploring power relations in the adoption of social protection policies in Kenya
Abstract
Power, and how it is exercised within social relations is pivotal in explaining policy change. However, its analysis as an explanatory variable in understanding social protection policy uptake processes in developing countries remains unexplored. Using two cases of cash transfer programmes in Kenya, we examine the dynamics of power relations in the uptake of social protection policies. This article contributes to recent scholarship examining the adoption process in African countries but in departure demonstrates that asymmetrical power relations between actors are/have been central to the uptake of the programmes. The study found that within social relations in the policy space, agents exercised power in three ways. First, by controlling the policy agenda by insertion of experts; second, by excluding other actors through a process of depoliticisation; and third, by influencing the preference of domestic actors through social learning.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As pointed out by Ouma and Adésínà (2019), many SCTs in Africa are primarily funded and implemented by donors and international organisations, which often ignore or do not consider local political and economic dynamics.”
From Citizens’ Claims‐Making and Navigating the Politics of Accountability in Social Cash Transfers in Uganda (2025) · cites this paper as Ouma and Adésínà (2019)
In the citing paper
“Ouma and Adésínà (2019, p. 383) emphasise that such framing 'limits the role of citizens in holding governments to account and contradicts donor rhetoric of participation, thereby entrenching top-down processes that lack transparency.'”
From Citizens’ Claims‐Making and Navigating the Politics of Accountability in Social Cash Transfers in Uganda (2025) · cites this paper as Ouma and Adésínà (2019, p. 383)
In the citing paper
“This section has argued that, in the context of SAGE, weak administrative capacity, diffuse responsibility between administrative staff and payment providers, and fragmentation of accountability structures due to the technocratic logic of setting up SP programmes (Ouma & Adésínà, 2019) lead to a weakened and inefficient response from the state and service providers to citizens' complaints and”
From Citizens’ Claims‐Making and Navigating the Politics of Accountability in Social Cash Transfers in Uganda (2025) · cites this paper as Ouma & Adésínà, 2019
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Research works printed but not linked: 48
- Adejumobi S, 2004, Globalization and Social Policy in Africa
- 10.1080/02255189.2011.647441 · DOI
- Alcock C, 2000, Introducing Social Policy
- 10.1057/9780230590984_6 · DOI
- 10.1080/13600810903305257 · DOI
- 10.1080/0376835X.2013.756098 · DOI
- 10.1177/1468018113484608 · DOI
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198769446.003.0006 · DOI
- 10.1080/09584935.2011.565312 · DOI
- 10.1002/bs.3830020303 · DOI
- 10.1080/02255189.2011.647443 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.x · DOI
- 10.1080/01442870902863828 · DOI
- Ferguson J, 1994, The Anti-Politics Machine: Development, Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho
- 10.1093/019924264X.001.0001 · DOI
- Flyvbjerg B, 1998, Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice
- 10.1177/1468018115615643 · DOI
- Foucault M, 1980, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977
- 10.1086/448181 · DOI · Paper page
- Foucault M, 2002, Archaeology of Knowledge
- Government of Kenya, 2016, Inua Jamii: Towards a More Effective National Safety Net for Kenya
- Higgins S, 2012, Journal of Politics and Society, 23, 88
- 10.1080/03056249408704088 · DOI
- 10.1596/0-8213-3610-X · DOI
- John P, 2012, Analyzing Public Policy
- 10.2202/1944-2858.1018 · DOI
- Kpessa MW, 2013, Developing Country Studies, 3, 94
- 10.1080/09692290.2011.561125 · DOI
- 10.1177/0261018317749438 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/ijsw.12210 · DOI
- 10.1215/9780822389781 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5 · DOI
- 10.1177/0261018309105180 · DOI
- 10.1080/19452820903481400 · DOI
- 10.1057/9780230306721_7 · DOI
- 10.1017/S004388711500009X · DOI
- Mkandawire TP, 2002, African Voices on Structural Adjustment
- 10.1177/0308518X16669353 · DOI
- Murunga GR, 2013, Kenya: The Struggle for Democracy
- 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2011.00417.x · DOI
- Pruce K, 2017, SSRN
- 10.1017/S1740022814000084 · DOI
- 10.1093/heapol/czw052 · DOI
- Tambulasi R, 2013, Policy Transfer and Learning in Public Policy and Management: International Contexts, Content and Development, 80
- Taube G, 1993, Africa Spectrum, 28, 165
- 10.1080/14662043.2017.1327925 · DOI
- Weber M, 1986, Power
- Weyland K, 2007, Bounded Rationality and Policy Diffusion: Social Sector Reform in Latin America
Cited by
El Assal, A. (2025) · Politics and Governance · doi:10.17645/pag.11237
“…administrative staff and payment providers, and fragmentation of accountability structures due to the technocratic logic of setting up SP programmes (Ouma & Adésínà, 2019) lead to a weakened and inefficient response from the state and service providers to citizens’ complaints and grievances.”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Ouma, M., & Adésínà, J.
- Affiliations
- University of South Africa (ZA)
- University of South Africa, South Africa
- Corresponding author
- Ouma, Marion
- ORCID
- Ouma, Marion
- Venue
- Critical Social Policy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-12-05
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 376-395
- ISSN
- 0261-0183 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-703X
- OpenAlex
- W2902169452
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7
- FWCI
- 18.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Critical Social Policy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policy Transfer and Learning
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Social Sciences › Development › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
- Keywords
- power relations, social protection policy, policy uptake, cash transfers, policy adoption, depoliticization, social learning, policy agenda setting, expert influence, Kenya
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Solutions, exclusion and influence: Exploring power relations in the adoption of social protection policies in Kenya. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0261018318817482
- The paper
- Ouma, M., & Adésínà, J. (2019). Solutions, exclusion and influence: Exploring power relations in the adoption of social protection policies in Kenya. Critical Social Policy. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018318817482
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.