Cited by 5Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsNMR spectroscopy and applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Common Marmoset Head

Lee, Vee-Meng, Burdett, Newman G., Carpenter, T. Adrian, Herrod, Nicholas J., James, Michael F., Hall, Laurance D.·1998·Alternatives to Laboratory Animals

Abstract

This study evaluated the changes in the intrinsic magnetic resonance (MR) relaxation parameter values (T 1; T 2 , proton density, magnetisation transfer and apparent diffusion coefficient) of the marmoset head, imaged before and after death. Knowing the absolute values of the MR parameters makes it possible to choose an imaging protocol for optimal structural differentiation. The changes between the ante-mortem and post-mortem MR parameters provide an insight into the changing biophysical microenvironment of the post-mortem brain, and allow some of the changes that occur in pathological conditions to be predicted. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging (MRI) was used to map quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient values, and to investigate diffusional anisotropy along the fibre tracts in pre-mortem and post-mortem brain tissue. A three-dimensional data set of the entire marmoset brain demonstrates the ability of three-dimensional MRI to differentiate internal brain structures. MRI is a non-invasive technique which, in principle, permits the same animal to be re-imaged serially and has the potential to probe in vivo brain structural and biophysical changes over an extended period of time. Serial imaging, where each animal acts as its own control, reduces the number of animals required to detect a significant change by minimising the effects of inter-subject variance. MRI therefore provides important scientific and ethical benefits.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/026119299802600309

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Niendolf T., 1994, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 32, 672
  2. Pnelmeier F., 1994, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 31, 678
  3. Bizzi A., 1993, American Journal of Neurological Research, 14, 1347

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lee, V.-M., Burdett, N. G., Carpenter, T. A., Herrod, N. J., James, M. F., & Hall, L. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, New Frontiers Science Park (North), Third Avenue, Harlow, Essex CM19 5AW, UK
Venue
Alternatives to Laboratory Animals
Published
1998-05
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
343-356
ISSN
  • 0261-1929 (ISSN-L)
  • 2632-3559
OpenAlex
W2432828955
Cited by
5
References
26
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Alternatives to Laboratory Animals (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › NMR spectroscopy and applications
Keywords
marmoset, apparent diffusion coefficient, diffusion-weighted imaging, diffusion anisotropy, 3D MRI, serial imaging, non-invasive brain imaging, brain microenvironment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review