When There is No He/She: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Genderless Language Use and Its Impact on Gender Ideology
Open accessAbstract
This study examines the relationship between the gender status of spoken languages and attitudes toward gender equality. Studies show that gendered languages subconsciously contribute to a masculine–feminine dichotomy, favoring men, while genderless languages minimize the reinforcement of gender stereotypes. Using data from the World Value Survey Wave 7, we analyzed if speaking a genderless language at home and living in a predominantly genderless-language-speaking country is associated with gender ideologies across four subcultural groups. Ordered logistic regression results show that genderless languages have mixed relationships with gender ideology. Whereas the use and exposure to genderless languages most significantly increase the odds of opposing domestic violence in Orthodox Europe, West, and South Asia, and the African Islamic subgroups, genderless language has the highest positive association with support for income equality in marriage in Latin America. Our findings highlight the relationship between genderless languages and gender ideology, particularly as the importance of gendered pronouns gains visibility.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research has shown that in some countries with genderless language, individuals show more support for gender equality and opposition to domestic violence toward the wife compared to those in predominantly non-genderless language-speaking countries.
“research has shown that in some countries with genderless language, individuals show more support for gender equality and opposition to domestic violence toward the wife compared to those in predominantly non-genderless language-speaking countries (Tanabe et al., 2025).”
From A Sexist Language? Gender Differences in Attitudes and Use of Gender-Inclusive Pronouns (2025) · cites this paper as Tanabe et al., 2025
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Sexist Language? Gender Differences in Attitudes and Use of Gender-Inclusive Pronouns
Remsö, A., Bäck, H., & Renström, E. A. (2025) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x251335305 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“One example is that research has shown that in some countries with genderless language, individuals show more support for gender equality and opposition to domestic violence toward the wife compared to those in predominantly non-genderless language-speaking countries (Tanabe et al., 2025).”
- Authors
- Tanabe, M., Tun, L., Vaseiezadeh, N., & Dogan, I.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tanabe, Megumi
- Venue
- Journal of Language and Social Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2025-03-17
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 623-681
- ISSN
- 0261-927X (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6526
- OpenAlex
- W4408508023
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 5.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Language and Social Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
- Keywords
- gender ideology, gender equality attitudes, gendered pronouns, gender stereotypes, gender and language, subcultural groups, cross-cultural comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review