Cited by 3Gender Studies in LanguageGender and Feminist StudiesMedia, Gender, and Advertising

When There is No He/She: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Genderless Language Use and Its Impact on Gender Ideology

Open access
Tanabe, Megumi, Tun, Lily, Vaseiezadeh, Nasim, Dogan, Imge·2025·Journal of Language and Social Psychology

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between the gender status of spoken languages and attitudes toward gender equality. Studies show that gendered languages subconsciously contribute to a masculine–feminine dichotomy, favoring men, while genderless languages minimize the reinforcement of gender stereotypes. Using data from the World Value Survey Wave 7, we analyzed if speaking a genderless language at home and living in a predominantly genderless-language-speaking country is associated with gender ideologies across four subcultural groups. Ordered logistic regression results show that genderless languages have mixed relationships with gender ideology. Whereas the use and exposure to genderless languages most significantly increase the odds of opposing domestic violence in Orthodox Europe, West, and South Asia, and the African Islamic subgroups, genderless language has the highest positive association with support for income equality in marriage in Latin America. Our findings highlight the relationship between genderless languages and gender ideology, particularly as the importance of gendered pronouns gains visibility.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0261927x251326200

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research has shown that in some countries with genderless language, individuals show more support for gender equality and opposition to domestic violence toward the wife compared to those in predominantly non-genderless language-speaking countries.

    “research has shown that in some countries with genderless language, individuals show more support for gender equality and opposition to domestic violence toward the wife compared to those in predominantly non-genderless language-speaking countries (Tanabe et al., 2025).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tanabe, M., Tun, L., Vaseiezadeh, N., & Dogan, I.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Tanabe, Megumi
Venue
Journal of Language and Social Psychology
Published
2025-03-17
Volume
44
Issue
5
Pages
623-681
ISSN
  • 0261-927X (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6526
OpenAlex
W4408508023
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
5.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Language and Social Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
Keywords
gender ideology, gender equality attitudes, gendered pronouns, gender stereotypes, gender and language, subcultural groups, cross-cultural comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review