Cited by 33Disability Education and EmploymentInclusion and Disability in Education and SportCollaborative Teaching and Inclusion

Turning a blind eye? Removing barriers to science and mathematics education for students with visual impairments

Open access
Hayes, Cicely, Proulx, Michael J·2024·British Journal of Visual Impairment

Abstract

With complex, visual concepts prevailing in science and mathematics curricula, these subjects are often inaccessible to students with visual impairments (VI), leading to their underrepresentation in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) careers. While researchers have identified strategies that can facilitate students with VI’s learning within special schools, less is known about how students with VI access science and mathematics within a mainstream context, even though this is where the majority are educated. This seems important to address given the additional barrier students with VI face within mainstream schools, including negative attitudes from mainstream teachers. Consequently, the current study was conducted to explore how students with VI’s access to and learning of science and mathematics can be improved within the mainstream context. Two interviews were conducted with qualified teachers of children and young people with vision impairment (QTVIs), revealing the importance of classroom adaptations, such as hands-on experience and increased lesson time, to facilitate students with VI’s learning of science and mathematics. These findings are discussed in relation to policy and practice, suggesting mainstream teachers should be trained to make small but effective adaptations in their teaching, and that students with VI are given the opportunity to learn skills needed to become independent learners.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/02646196221149561

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hayes, C., & Proulx, M. J.
Affiliations
University of Bath (GB)
Venue
British Journal of Visual Impairment
Published
2023-01-26
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
544-556
ISSN
  • 0264-6196 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5809
OpenAlex
W4319790919
Cited by
32
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 7
FWCI
8.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
British Journal of Visual Impairment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
CAMERA 2.0 (EP/T022523/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
  • Social Sciences › Education › Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
Keywords
visual impairment, science education, mathematics education, mainstream education, inclusive education, teacher attitudes, classroom adaptation, hands-on learning, STEM careers, teacher professional development, self-directed learning, special schools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review