The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Perceptions of power and interactional dominance in interpersonal relationships
Abstract
This investigation uses dyadic power theory (Dunbar, 2000, 2004; Rollins & Bahr, 1976) to examine the relationship between dominance and power and the behavioral manifestations of power in close relationships. Ninety-seven couples (58 married, 39 cohabiting) completed a problem-solving task together while being videotaped. The videotapes were coded for a variety of verbal and nonverbal dominant control attempts including dysfluencies, interruptions, frequency of adaptor and illustrator gestures, vocal characteristics, and general perceptions of dominance. The results revealed that individuals’ perceptions of power led to more dominant communication behavior during discussions with their partner. Comparisons between the perceptions of participants and observers and the implications for future research are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The psychology of interpersonal relations.
Heider, F. (1958) · doi:10.1037/10628-000 · Cited by 13,457
The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations.
Newcomb, T., & Heider, F. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089062 · Cited by 11,822
Payne, G., Dingwall, R. W. J., Payne, J., & Carter, M. (1981) · Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) · Cited by 5,015
FRENCH, J. R. P., & RAVEN, B. (1986) · Political Leadership · doi:10.2307/jj.12381759.38 · Cited by 4,542
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991) · Cited by 2,339
Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology
(2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511996481 · Cited by 1,942
Handbook of Interpersonal Communication
(2008) · doi:10.1515/9783110211399 · Cited by 1,778
(2006) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00280.x · Cited by 1,281
Handbook of Interpersonal Communication
Knapp, M. L., & Miller, G. R. (1985) · Cited by 1,108
Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view.
Gottman, J. M., & Krokoff, L. J. (1989) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.57.1.47 · Cited by 1,104
Cited by
Nonverbal overload: A theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue.
Bailenson, J. N. (2021) · Technology, Mind, and Behavior · doi:10.1037/tmb0000030 · Cited by 1,203
The power of being heard: The benefits of ‘perspective-giving’ in the context of intergroup conflict
Bruneau, E. G., & Saxe, R. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.017 · Cited by 346
Automatic nonverbal analysis of social interaction in small groups: A review
Gatica-Perez, D. (2009) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2009.01.004 · Cited by 309
Signs of Social Class: The Experience of Economic Inequality in Everyday Life
Kraus, M. W., Park, J. W., & Tan, J. J. X. (2017) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691616673192 · Cited by 288
Emotion-focused couples therapy: The dynamics of emotion, love, and power.
Greenberg, L. S., & Goldman, R. N. (2008) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/11750-000 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Dunbar, N. E., & Burgoon, J. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 207-233
- ISSN
- 0265-4075 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3608
- OpenAlex
- W1967880820
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 73
- FWCI
- 9.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perceptions of power and interactional dominance in interpersonal relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0265407505050944
- The paper
- Dunbar, N. E., & Burgoon, J. K. (2005). Perceptions of power and interactional dominance in interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407505050944
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
