The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
When “we” changes “me”: The two-dimensional model of relational self-change and relationship outcomes
Open accessAbstract
Individuals in close relationships may perceive changes to their self-concepts as a result of being with their partners. According to the two-dimensional model of relational self-change, these changes occur across two dimensions, namely direction, which reflects whether the self-concept has gained or lost content, and valence, which reflects whether the self-concept content is positive or negative. These two dimensions combine to create four distinct self-change processes, whereby individuals gain positive traits (self-expansion), gain negative traits (self-adulteration), lose positive traits (self-contraction), and lose negative traits (self-pruning). Study 1 used a longitudinal design and revealed that changes in each of the four self-processes were associated with subsequent relationship satisfaction and commitment. To further investigate the association of self-change with relationship quality, Study 2 found that processes associated with self-concept improvement (i.e., self-expansion and self-pruning) were positively associated with relationship maintenance behaviors and motivations (e.g., accommodation, forgiveness, and willingness to sacrifice), whereas processes associated with self-concept degradation (i.e., self-contraction and self-adulteration) were negatively associated with these outcomes and positively associated with behaviors that may harm the relationship (e.g., dissolution considerations, attention to alternatives, and seeking revenge).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The improvement of self-concept is positively correlated with relationship maintenance motivations and behaviors.
“the improvement of self-concept is positively correlated with relationship maintenance motivations and behaviors [12].”
From Self-Concept Clarity and Loneliness among College Students: The Chain-Mediating Effect of Fear of Negative Evaluation and Self-Disclosure (2024) · cites this paper as [12]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships.
Agnew, C. R., Van Lange, P. A. M., Rusbult, C. E., & Langston, C. A. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.939 · Cited by 718
Couples' shared participation in novel and arousing activities and experienced relationship quality.
Aron, A., Norman, C. C., Aron, E. N., McKenna, C., & Heyman, R. E. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.273 · Cited by 681
Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T., Mashek, D., Lewandowski, G., Wright, S. C., & Aron, E. N. (2004) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463280440000008 · Cited by 391
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- Agnew C. R., 2014, Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior
- Agnew C. R., 2004, Handbook of closeness and intimacy, 103
- 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398694.013.0005 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1102 · DOI
- Arriaga X. B., 2004, Components of commitment in relational and organizational contexts
- 10.1111/1467-6494.00178 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.293 · DOI
- 10.1111/1475-6811.00016 · DOI
- Finkel E. J., 2009, Self-regulation: Cognitive, affective, and motivational processes, 319
- 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.956 · DOI
- 10.1177/0265407510373258 · DOI
- 10.1037/11059-000 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-6566(90)90019-3 · DOI
- 10.1177/02654075030204003 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01285.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00120.x · DOI
- 10.1080/17439760601069234 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0017838 · DOI
- 10.1080/15298868.2012.718863 · DOI
- 10.1080/17439760.2012.746999 · DOI
- 10.1111/spc3.12080 · DOI
- 10.1177/1948550613503886 · DOI
- 10.1111/pere.12025 · DOI
- 10.1080/01973533.2013.856788 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.758 · DOI
- 10.1006/jesp.1999.1417 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167204271597 · DOI
- 10.1177/02654075030201002 · DOI
- 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/026540759301000205 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01657.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.60.1.53 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.007 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167209352250 · DOI
- 10.1080/15298868.2011.649860 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1373 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167209337543 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pang, T., Wang, H., Zhang, X., & Zhang, X. (2024) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs14030194 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- McIntyre, K. P., Mattingly, B. A., & Lewandowski, G. W.
- Affiliations
- Trinity University (US)
- Ursinus College (US)
- Monmouth University (US)
- Corresponding author
- McIntyre, Kevin P.
- Venue
- Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-10-10
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 857-878
- ISSN
- 0265-4075 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3608
- OpenAlex
- W2039198216
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 1.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Social and Personal Relationships (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - Trinity University (Trinity University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
- Keywords
- self-concept, self-expansion, self-contraction, self-pruning, two-dimensional model, relationship satisfaction, relationship commitment, relationship maintenance, accommodation, forgiveness, revenge, close relationships
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review