Cited by 4Healthcare cost, quality, practicesHealth Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Sciences Research and Education

Dissemination and Implementation Science for Oral Health: Why not consider de-implementation of low-value care to target oral health equity?

Bomfim, Rafael Aiello, Arriola-Pacheco, Fabio·2025·Community Dental Health

Abstract

Dissemination and implementation sciences provide oral health professionals with an opportunity to understand which determinants promote the adoption of evidence-based innovations and interventions. Within this dynamic field, de-implementation provides the other side of the coin, that is, finding the ways to halt or modify practices that may be harmful to patients, do not hold sufficient scientific backing, or are simply not cost-efficient; conjointly known as low-value care. Scrutinizing low-value care procedures in oral health is essential, as identifying such practices creates opportunities to replace, update, or enhance them with approaches that offer greater benefits to patients, practitioners, and healthcare systems. Effective de-implementation begins with a clear understanding of which low-value practices persist. Only then can we conceptualize strategies to overcome barriers and promote more efficient, evidence-based care within the field. Furthermore, de-implementation can serve as a way to target oral health equity, as shifting away from low value care practices can lead to the better use of human and economic resources in those places where it is needed most. This commentary serves as a conceptualization of de-implementation within oral health, as well as, an invitation for the broader community to reflect on the importance of adequately mobilizing towards the delivery of more equitable care using the vigorous elements that dissemination and implementation science…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0265539x251355214

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Implementation science has gradually entered oral health, contributing to guideline uptake, behavioral interventions, and deimplementation of low-value care.

    “Implementation science has gradually entered the field of oral health, with important contributions to the adoption of clinical guidelines and recent debates on the deimplementation of low-value care.”

    From New Frontiers for Implementation Science in Oral Health: Digital and Equity-Driven Pathways (2026) · cites this paper as Bomfim and Arriola-Pacheco 2025

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bomfim, R. A., & Arriola-Pacheco, F.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (BR)
  • Dental Public Health Discipline, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
Corresponding author
Bomfim, Rafael Aiello
Venue
Community Dental Health
Published
2025-06-26
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
83-89
ISSN
  • 0265-539X (ISSN-L)
  • 2515-1746
OpenAlex
W4411667461
Cited by
2
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Community Dental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
de-implementation, low-value care, oral health equity, dissemination and implementation research, evidence-based practice, oral care, barriers to care, healthcare resource allocation
MeSH terms
Health Equity, Implementation Science, Dental Care, Humans, Oral Health, Evidence-Based Dentistry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review