Cited by 63Migration and Exile StudiesDiaspora, migration, transnational identityMigration, Health, Geopolitics, Historical Geography

The digital border: Mobility beyond territorial and symbolic divides

Open access
Chouliaraki, Lilie, Georgiou, Myria·2019·European Journal of Communication

Abstract

In this article, we develop a definition of the digital border as an assemblage of mediations that articulates digital and other technologies with symbolic resources to draw boundaries of inside/outside both on the ground (territorial border) and in narrative (symbolic border). We subsequently sketch the contours of this assemblage through an emphasis on its dynamics of mediation, its dialectics of resistance and its trajectories of historicity and argue for the significance of this conceptualisation of the digital border in migration research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0267323119886147

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Digital technologies that are used at borders, and visualizations of migration circulated in digital media, raise a new 'digital border' intended 'to protect' European citizens from migrants.

    “Digital technologies that are used at borders, and visualizations of migration circulated in digital media raise a new 'digital border' (Chouliaraki and Georgiou, 2019) intended 'to protect' European citizens from migrants.”

    From Border countervisuality: smartphone videos of border crossing and migration (2023) · cites this paper as Chouliaraki and Georgiou, 2019

    The Introduction (page unavailable) links digital border controls with migration narratives in digital news, and the Conclusion describes the digital border as an assemblage of surveillance and representation. The paper discusses security and portrayals of migrants as threats, but the passages do not establish that this assemblage is intended specifically to protect European citizens from migrants. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Berry M, Garcia-Blanco I, Moore K (2015) Press coverage of the refugee and migrant crisis in the EU: A content analysis of five European countries. Report prepared for the United Nations High Commission for Refugees, Cardiff School of Journalism, Media and Cultural Studies. Available at: http://www.unhcr.org/56bb369c9.html (accessed 15 June 2017).
  2. Georgiou M, Zaborowski R (2016) Refugee ‘Crisis’? Try ‘crisis’ in the European press. openDemocracy. Available at: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/refugee-crisis-try-crisis-in-european-press
  3. Gürsel D, 2017, Movements: Journal for Critical Migration and Border Regime Studies, 3, 133
  4. Madianou M, 2016, International Journal of Communication, 9, 3020
  5. Van Houtum H, 2005, Bordering Space
  6. Yuval-Davis N, 2019, Bordering

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chouliaraki, L., & Georgiou, M.
Affiliations
London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Corresponding author
Chouliaraki, Lilie
Venue
European Journal of Communication
Published
2019-12
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
594-605
ISSN
  • 0267-3231 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-3705
OpenAlex
W2995102001
Cited by
63
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4
FWCI
9.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Communication (publishedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Exile Studies
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Diaspora, migration, transnational identity
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Migration, Health, Geopolitics, Historical Geography
Keywords
digital borders, territorial boundaries, symbolic boundaries, migration, assemblage, mediation (cultural/media theory), resistance, digital technologies, migration narratives, historicity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review