The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adding more fuel to the fire: An eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and non-native speakers
Open accessAbstract
Using eye-tracking, we investigate on-line processing of idioms in a biasing story context by native and non-native speakers of English. The stimuli are idioms used figuratively ( at the end of the day — ‘eventually’), literally ( at the end of the day — ‘in the evening’), and novel phrases ( at the end of the war). Native speaker results indicate a processing advantage for idioms over novel phrases, as evidenced by fewer and shorter fixations. Further, no processing advantage is found for figurative idiom uses over literal ones in a full idiom analysis or in a recognition point analysis. Contrary to native speaker results, non-native findings suggest that L2 speakers process idioms at a similar speed to novel phrases. Further, figurative uses are processed more slowly than literal ones. Importantly, the recognition point analysis allows us to establish where non-natives slow down when processing the figurative meaning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Foundations of Cognitive Grammar
Winters, M. E., & Langacker, R. W. (1988) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/327796 · Cited by 5,665
Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-1385 · Cited by 4,458
Corpus, Concordance, Collocation
Green, P. N. (1992) · Cited by 3,465
Formulaic Language and the Lexicon
Wray, A. (2002) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511519772 · Cited by 2,873 · cited 3×
“The use of formulaic language, such as collocations, idioms, speech formulae, and binomials is regarded as an essential element of native-like communication (Pawley and Syder, 1983; Langacker, 1987; Sinclair, 1991; Cowie, 1998; Wray, 2002; Tomasello, 2003).”
BackgroundCorpus, Concordance, Collocation
Odlin, T., & Sinclair, J. (1994) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/330144 · Cited by 2,297
Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning
Schmitt, N. (2008) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168808089921 · Cited by 1,467
Self-citationMore than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases
Arnon, I., & Snider, N. (2010) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.005 · Cited by 791
The access and processing of idiomatic expressions
Swinney, D. A., & Cutler, A. (1979) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(79)90284-6 · Cited by 727
Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N. (2008) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amm022 · Cited by 653
Self-citation
Cited by
Türker, E. (2016) · Second Language Research · doi:10.1177/0267658315593336 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N.
- Venue
- Second Language Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-02-21
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 251-272
- ISSN
- 0165-9960 (ISSN-L)
- 0267-6583
- 1477-0326
- OpenAlex
- W2138747152
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 44.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adding more fuel to the fire: An eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and non-native speakers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0267658310382068
- The paper
- Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N. (2011). Adding more fuel to the fire: An eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and non-native speakers. Second Language Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658310382068
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.