The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigating L2 writing processes across independent and integrated tasks: A mixed-methods study
Abstract
Most research into second language (L2) writing has focused on the products of writing tasks; much less empirical work has examined the behaviours in which L2 writers engage and the cognitive processes that underlie writing behaviours. We aimed to fill this gap by investigating the extent to which writing speed fluency, pausing, eye-gaze behaviours and the cognitive processes associated with pausing may vary across independent and integrated tasks throughout the whole, and at five different stages, of the writing process. Sixty L2 writers performed two independent and two integrated TOEFL iBT writing tasks counterbalanced across participants. While writing, we logged participants’ keystrokes and captured their eye-movements. Participants took part in a stimulated recall interview based on the last task they had completed. Mixed effects regressions and qualitative analyses revealed that, apart from source use on the integrated task, L2 writers engaged in similar writing behaviours and cognitive processes during the independent and integrated tasks. The integrated task, however, elicited more dynamic and varied behaviours and cognitive processes across writing stages. Adopting a mixed-methods approach enabled us to gain more complete and specific insights than using a single method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For instance, eye-gaze behaviors provide direct and objective evidence, including fixation duration, fixation count, and scanning path, allowing for stronger conclusions about learners' cognitive processes and learning strategies (Lai et al., 2013;Michel et al., 2020).”
From A systematic review of Stimulated Recall (SR) in educational research from 2012 to 2022 (2024) · cites this paper as Michel et al., 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193146 · Cited by 65,971
Research works printed but not linked: 45
- 10.1111/lang.12232 · DOI
- 10.1177/0265532213509810 · DOI
- Barkaoui K, 2015, Test takers’ writing activities during the TOEFL iBT writing tasks: A stimulated recall study
- 10.1017/S027226311900010X · DOI
- Biber D, 2013, Discourse characteristics of writing and speaking task types on the TOEFL iBT test: A lexico-grammatical analysis
- Brunfaut T, 2015, Looking into test-takers’ cognitive processes whilst completing reading tasks: a mixed-method eye-tracking and stimulated recall study
- 10.1017/S027226311900007X · DOI
- 10.1017/9781108233279 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/15434303.2011.622016 · DOI
- 10.1515/9781614511335-006 · doi:10.1515/9781614511335-006
- David V, 2015, Impromptu timed-writing and process-based timed-writing exams: Comparing students’ performance and investigating students’ and raters’ perceptions
- 10.1002/ets2.12071 · DOI
- Enright M, 2011, Validity evidence supporting the interpretation and use of TOEFL iBT scores
- 10.2307/356630 · doi:10.2307/356630 · Paper page
- 10.1348/978185409X421129 · DOI
- 10.1111/lang.12280 · DOI
- Hayes JR, 1996, The science of writing, 1
- Kellogg RT, 1996, The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications, 57
- 10.17239/jowr-2015.06.03.2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0741088313491692 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0272263119000251 · DOI
- 10.5054/tq.2011.240859 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.asw.2008.07.001 · DOI
- 10.1111/lang.12079 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4324/9781315676968-17 · doi:10.4324/9781315676968-17
- 10.1017/S0272263119000329 · DOI
- 10.1111/lang.12205 · DOI · Paper page
- Révész A, 2017, Investigating IELTS Academic Writing Task 2: Relationships between cognitive writing processes, text quality, and working memory
- 10.1017/S027226311900024X · DOI · Paper page
- Rijlaarsdam G, 1996, The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications, 107
- 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.08.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80111-8 · DOI
- Scardamalia M, 1987, Advances in Applied Psycholinguistics, 2, 142
- Schilperoord J, 1996, It’s about time: Temporal aspects of cognitive processes in text production, 10.1163/9789004458598 · DOI
- 10.1191/136216800675510135 · doi:10.1191/136216800675510135
- Spelman Miller K, 2006, Computer key-stroke logging: Methods and applications, 131
- 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00140.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.06.002 · DOI
- Tillema M, 2012, Writing in first and second language: Empirical studies on text quality and writing processes
- 10.1007/s11409-011-9072-x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.compcom.2015.09.012 · DOI
- Van Weijen D, 2009, Writing processes, text quality, and tasks effects: Empirical studies in first and second language writing
- 10.3758/BRM.41.2.337 · DOI
- Xu C, 2017, Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 20, 24
Cited by
Eye tracking technology for examining cognitive processes in education: a systematic review
Liu, X., & Cui, Y. (2025) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105263 · Cited by 59
A systematic review of Stimulated Recall (SR) in educational research from 2012 to 2022
Zhai, X., Chu, X., Wang, M., Tsai, C.-C., Liang, J.-C., & Spector, J. M. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-02987-6 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Michel, M., Révész, A., Lu, X., Kourtali, N.-E., Lee, M., & Borges, L.
- Venue
- Second Language Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-05-13
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 307-334
- ISSN
- 0267-6583
- 1477-0326
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Funders
- educational testing service (Committee of Examiners and the Test of English as)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigating L2 writing processes across independent and integrated tasks: A mixed-methods study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0267658320915501
- The paper
- Michel, M., Révész, A., Lu, X., Kourtali, N.-E., Lee, M., & Borges, L. (2020). Investigating L2 writing processes across independent and integrated tasks: A mixed-methods study. Second Language Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658320915501
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.