The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Changing Paradigms of Citizenship and the Exclusiveness of the Demos
Abstract
Three distinct components of the citizenship principle have been identified in the literature: a political principle of democracy, a juridical status of legal personhood and a form of membership and political identity. The modern paradigm of citizenship was based on the assumption that these components would neatly map onto one another on the terrain of the democratic welfare state. Globalization, new forms of transnational migration, the partial disaggregation of state sovereignty and the development of human rights regimes have rendered this model anachronistic. Only if the various elements of the citizenship principle are disaggregated and reinstitutionalized on independent levels of governance, some national, some supranational, will the exclusiveness constitutive of the ideal of citizenship be tempered with the demands of justice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy
Habermas, J. (1996) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001 · Cited by 9,998
The Origins of Totalitarianism
Arendt, H. (2018) · Princeton Readings in Political Thought · doi:10.2307/j.ctv19fvzzk.50 · Cited by 5,173
Multiculturalism and the politics of recognition
Landesman, B. M. (1992) · Cited by 2,899
Territoriality and beyond: problematizing modernity in international relations
Ruggie, J. G. (1993) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818300004732 · Cited by 2,672
Citizenship and nationhood in France and Germany
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-4034 · Cited by 2,585
Losing control?: sovereignty in an age of globalization
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3545 · Cited by 2,311
Class, Citizenship, and Social Development.
Moore, W. E., Marshall, T. H., & Lipset, S. M. (1964) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091434 · Cited by 2,126
Democracy and the global order: from the modern state to cosmopolitan governance
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-6572 · Cited by 1,959
Walzer, M. (1983) · Cited by 1,796
The Origins of Totalitarianism
Meyer, H., & Arendt, H. (1959) · Books Abroad · doi:10.2307/40097039 · Cited by 1,603
Cited by
Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders
Abizadeh, A. (2008) · Political Theory · doi:10.1177/0090591707310090 · Cited by 661
Intersectionality, Citizenship and Contemporary Politics of Belonging
Yuval‐Davis, N. (2007) · Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy · doi:10.1080/13698230701660220 · Cited by 366
Lopez-Guerra, C. (2005) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2005.00221.x · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Cohen, J. L.
- Venue
- International Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 245-268
- ISSN
- 0268-5809 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7242
- OpenAlex
- W1992639395
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 15.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changing Paradigms of Citizenship and the Exclusiveness of the Demos. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0268580999014003002
- The paper
- Cohen, J. L. (1999). Changing Paradigms of Citizenship and the Exclusiveness of the Demos. International Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580999014003002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.