The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Goal attainment scaling (GAS) in rehabilitation: a practical guide
Abstract
Goal attainment scaling is a mathematical technique for quantifying the achievement (or otherwise) of goals set, and it can be used in rehabilitation. Because several different approaches are described in the literature, this article presents a simple practical approach to encourage uniformity in its application. It outlines the process of setting goals appropriately, so that the achievement of each goal can be measured on a 5-point scale ranging from -2 to +2, and then explains a method for quantifying the outcome in a single aggregated goal attainment score. This method gives a numerical T-score which is normally distributed about a mean of 50 (if the goals are achieved precisely) with a standard deviation of around this mean of 10 (if the goals are overachieved or underachieved). If desired, the approach encompasses weighting of goals to reflect the opinion of the patient on the personal importance of the goal and the opinion of the therapist or team on the difficulty of achieving the goal. Some practical tips are offered, as well as a simple spreadsheet (in Microsoft Excel) allowing easy calculation of the T-scores.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.57.9.705 · Cited by 7,766
Writing SMART rehabilitation goals and achieving goal attainment scaling: a practical guide
Bovend'Eerdt, T. J., Botell, R. E., & Wade, D. T. (2009) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1177/0269215508101741 · Cited by 754
Cited by
Writing SMART rehabilitation goals and achieving goal attainment scaling: a practical guide
Bovend'Eerdt, T. J., Botell, R. E., & Wade, D. T. (2009) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1177/0269215508101741 · Cited by 754
What people with aphasia want: Their goals according to the ICF
Worrall, L., Sherratt, S., Rogers, P., Howe, T., Hersh, D., Ferguson, A., & Davidson, B. (2011) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2010.508530 · Cited by 443
The effects and experiences of goal setting in stroke rehabilitation – a systematic review
Sugavanam, T., Mead, G., Bulley, C., Donaghy, M., & van Wijck, F. (2013) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.690501 · Cited by 226
Krasny-Pacini, A., Evans, J., Sohlberg, M. M., & Chevignard, M. (2016) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2015.08.424 · Cited by 151
Patient engagement and satisfaction with goal planning: Impact on outcome from rehabilitation
Turner-Stokes, L., Rose, H., Ashford, S., & Singer, B. (2015) · International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation · doi:10.12968/ijtr.2015.22.5.210 · Cited by 91
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Turner-Stokes, L.
- Venue
- Clinical Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-01-29
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 362-370
- ISSN
- 0269-2155 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0873
- OpenAlex
- W2131027601
- Cited by
- 841
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 41.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Goal attainment scaling (GAS) in rehabilitation: a practical guide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0269215508101742
- The paper
- Turner-Stokes, L. (2009). Goal attainment scaling (GAS) in rehabilitation: a practical guide. Clinical Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215508101742
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.