Cited by 754Medical Practices and RehabilitationOccupational Therapy Practice and ResearchStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Writing SMART rehabilitation goals and achieving goal attainment scaling: a practical guide

Bovend'Eerdt, Thamar JH, Botell, Rachel E, Wade, Derick T·2009·Clinical Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective: To describe a practical method of setting personalized but specific goals in rehabilitation that also facilitates the use of goal attainment scaling. Background: Rehabilitation is a complex intervention requiring coordinated actions by a team, a process that depends upon setting interdisciplinary goals that are specific, clear and personal to the patient. Goal setting can take much time and still be vague. A practical and standardized method is needed for being specific. Method: A novel approach to writing specific, measurable, achievable, realistic/ relevant and timed (SMART) goals is developed here. Each goal can be built up by using up to four parts: the target activity, the support needed, quantification of performance and the time period to achieve the desired state. This method can be employed as part of goal attainment scaling and the other levels can be easily and quickly formulated by adding, deleting and/or changing one or more of the (sub)parts. Discussion: The success of goal setting and goal attainment scaling depends on the formulation of the goals. The method described here is a useful tool to standardize the writing of goals in rehabilitation. It saves time and simplifies the construction of goals that are sufficiently specific to be measurable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269215508101741

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bovend'Eerdt, T. J., Botell, R. E., & Wade, D. T.
Affiliations
  • Oxford Brookes University and Oxford Centre for Enablement, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford,
  • Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre (GB)
Venue
Clinical Rehabilitation
Published
2009-02-23
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
352-361
ISSN
  • 0269-2155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0873
OpenAlex
W2131171698
Cited by
754
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 12
FWCI
28.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
SMART goals, goal setting, goal attainment scaling, rehabilitation goals, goal formulation, patient-centered goals, interdisciplinary rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Goals, Humans, Occupational Therapy, Patient Care Planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review