Cited by 80Nursing care and researchStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Communication outcome after stroke: a new measure of the carer’s perspective

Long, Andrew, Hesketh, Anne, Bowen, Audrey·2009·Clinical Rehabilitation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To validate a measure of the carer's perspective of a stroke survivor's communication in everyday life. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, interview-based, psychometric study. SETTING: A community sample from the northwest of England, UK. SUBJECTS: Fifty-eight carers and 58 stroke survivors with communication problems (aphasia and/or dysarthria) following a stroke within the previous 4-12 months. INTERVENTIONS: Administration of the 20-item Carer Communication Outcome after Stroke (Carer COAST) scale, on two occasions, within a two-week period; the 15-item Carers of Older People in Europe (COPE) Index, the patient Communication Outcome after Stroke (COAST) Scale, and collection of demographic and other data relating to the stroke survivor's disability (Barthel Index), degree of aphasia (Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test) and hospital diagnosis of aphasia/dysarthria. MAIN MEASURES: Acceptability (missing values), reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability) and construct validity. RESULTS: Carer COAST showed good acceptability (no incomplete items, sample spread 24-100%), internal consistency and test-retest reliability for the scale (a = 0.94; intraclass correlation (ICC) = 0.91) and its subscales (a = 0.78-0.90; ICC = 0.75-0.87), and indicative evidence on construct validity (Carer COAST, COPE subscales and COAST). There were statistically significant correlations between the communication items of Carer COAST and the negative impact of caregiving (r(s) = -0.29) and the financial difficulties of caregiving (r(s) = -0.38). CONCLUSIONS: The Carer COAST scale has considerable potential as a reliable and valid measure of the carer's perspective on the communication effectiveness of stroke survivors. Intercorrelations with COPE provide specific evidence of the impact of caring for a person with communication difficulties following a stroke.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269215509336055

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Long, A., Hesketh, A., & Bowen, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Long, Andrew
Venue
Clinical Rehabilitation
Published
2009-05-29
Volume
23
Issue
9
Pages
846-856
ISSN
  • 0269-2155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0873
OpenAlex
W2153545062
Cited by
80
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 10
FWCI
16.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (02/11/04)
  • Health Technology Assessment Programme
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
stroke, caregiver perspectives, aphasia, dysarthria, scale validation, psychometric properties, caregiver burden, communication difficulties
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aphasia, Dysarthria, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Severity of Illness Index, Caregivers, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review