Cited by 128Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

QOLLTI-F: measuring family carer quality of life.

Cohen, Robin, Leis, Anne M, Kuhl, David, Charbonneau, Cécile, Ritvo, Paul, Ashbury, Fredrick D.·2006·Palliative Medicine

Abstract

Background The primary goal of palliative care is to optimize the quality of life (QOL) of people living with a life-threatening illness and that of their families. While there have been important advances in measurement of the QOL of palliative care patients, little attention has been paid to the QOL of their carers (family caregivers). To develop and deliver the most effective services to these carers, their QOL needs to be measured with acceptable and psychometrically sound instruments that have content validity. Methods This study reports three phases of the development and testing of such a measure: QOLLTI-F, Quality of Life in Life Threatening Illness--Family Carer Version, simultaneously in English and French. Participants were carers from 12 Canadian palliative care services who were asked to complete QOLLTI-F on three occasions. Results The final version of QOLLTI-F consists of 16 items. It was deemed acceptable by the vast majority of carers and a longer, 24-item version was completed in a median of 12 min. Content validity was assured by inclusion of all domains reported by carers to be important to their QOL: state of carer, patient wellbeing, quality of care, outlook, environment, finances and relationships. Construct validity was demonstrated, as principal components analysis indicated that the 16 items did indeed reflect these seven domains. Furthermore, the seven domain scores predicted 53% of the variance in global QOL, although the QOLLTI-F Total score predi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269216306072764

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohen, R., Leis, A. M., Kuhl, D., Charbonneau, C., Ritvo, P., & Ashbury, F. D.
Affiliations
  • Departments of Oncology and Medicine, McGill University, McGill University Health Centre and Lady Davis Research Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal,
  • University of Saskatchewan (CA)
  • Providence Health Care (CA)
  • Michel-Sarrazin (CA)
  • York University (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Palliative Medicine
Published
2006-12
Volume
20
Issue
8
Pages
755-767
ISSN
  • 0269-2163 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-030X
OpenAlex
W2161952146
Cited by
128
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
family caregivers, quality of life, palliative care, quality of life assessment, life-threatening illness, psychometric validation, content validity, construct validity, test-retest reliability, responsiveness to change, caregiver burden, patient well-being, financial concerns, caregiver-patient relationship, palliative care services
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Canada, Family, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Palliative Care, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Caregivers, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review