Cited by 26Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesRespiratory Support and MechanismsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Adapting to domiciliary non-invasive ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A qualitative interview study

Open access
Gale, Nicola K, Jawad, Maryam, Dave, Chirag, Turner, Alice M·2015·Palliative Medicine

Abstract

Background: Domiciliary non-invasive ventilation may be used in palliative care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, although there is uncertainty regarding effect on quality of life. Aim: Explore experiences of domiciliary non-invasive ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, to understand decision-making processes and improve future palliative care. Design: Qualitative interview study, based on constructivist grounded theory, and using the framework method for data management and analysis. Participants: 20 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients, 4 carers and 15 healthcare professionals. Results: Most patients had very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Data were categorised into four domains – clinical, technical, socio-economic and experiential. Healthcare professionals felt uncertain regarding clinical evidence, emphasising social support and tolerance as deciding factors in non-invasive ventilation use. Conversely, patients reported symptomatic benefit, which generally outweighed negative experiences and led to continued use. Healthcare professionals felt that patients chose to be on non-invasive ventilation; however, most patients felt that they had no choice as healthcare professionals recommended non-invasive ventilation or their poor health mandated it. Conclusions: Our study identifies ‘adapting to non-invasive ventilation’ as the central process enabling long-term use in palliative care, although the way in which this is approached by healthcare professionals and patients does not always converge. We present ideas emerging from the data on potential interventions to improve patient experience and adaptation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269216314558327

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Participants find it difficult to make an informed choice in favour of invasive home mechanical ventilation and are willing to have more decision-making support.

    “Specifically, it indicates that participants find it difficult to make an informed choice in favour of invasive HMV, willing to have more decision-making support [11–13].”

    From Life Experiences in Neuromuscular Tracheotomized Patients in Times of Covid-19 (2023) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Clinical domain (p. 6) and Clinical issues (p. 10) report that COPD patients felt they had little choice about accepting domiciliary ventilation, supporting the concern about informed choice. But the study concerns non-invasive ventilation, not invasive HMV, and the Conclusion (p. 11) proposes better explanations rather than reporting that participants wanted more decision-making support. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gale, N. K., Jawad, M., Dave, C., & Turner, A. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (GB)
  • Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Venue
Palliative Medicine
Published
2014-12-18
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
268-277
ISSN
  • 0269-2163 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-030X
OpenAlex
W2170831223
Cited by
26
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham Charity
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • University of Birmingham
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, palliative care, patient experience, decision-making, caregivers, quality of life
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Home Care Services, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Palliative Care, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Caregivers, Patient Satisfaction, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Qualitative Research, Noninvasive Ventilation, Grounded Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review