Cited by 47Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Posttraumatic stress symptoms in palliative care professionals seeking mindfulness training: Prevalence and vulnerability

O’Mahony, Sean, Gerhart, James I, Grosse, Johanna, Abrams, Ira, Levy, Mitchell M·2016·Palliative Medicine

Abstract

Background: Vicarious exposure to trauma is ubiquitous in palliative medicine. Repeated exposure to trauma may contribute to compassion fatigue and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in medical and supportive care professionals such as physicians, nurses, and social workers. These symptoms may be intensified among medical and supportive care professionals who use avoidant or rigid coping strategies. Aim: This study aimed to provide an estimate of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in a sample of professionals who work in palliative care settings, and have already been enrolled in mindfulness-based communication training. Design: Palliative care providers provided self-reported ratings of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, depression, and coping strategies using validated measures including the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire, Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire, and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist–Civilian Version. Setting/participants: A total of 21 professionals working with palliative care patients completed assessments prior to beginning mindfulness-based communication training. Results: Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms were prevalent in this sample of professionals; 42% indicated positive screens for significant posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, and 33% indicated probable posttraumatic stress disorder diagnosis. Conclusion: Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms may be common among professionals working in palliative medicine. Professionals prone to avoidant coping and those with more rigid negative thought processes may be at higher risk for posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269216315596459

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O’Mahony, S., Gerhart, J. I., Grosse, J., Abrams, I., & Levy, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • Shambhala Meditation Center of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
  • Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Gerhart, James I
Venue
Palliative Medicine
Published
2015-07-17
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
189-192
ISSN
  • 0269-2163 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-030X
OpenAlex
W2323318402
Cited by
47
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8
FWCI
12.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
posttraumatic stress symptoms, palliative care professionals, compassion fatigue, avoidance coping, cognitive fusion, depression, prevalence, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Palliative Care, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Stress, Psychological, Prevalence, Young Adult, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review