Cited by 67Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPalliative and Oncologic CarePalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Spiritual history taking in palliative home care: A cluster randomized controlled trial

Vermandere, Mieke, Warmenhoven, Franca, Van Severen, Evie, De Lepeleire, Jan, Aertgeerts, Bert·2016·Palliative Medicine

Abstract

Background Many health-care providers experience barriers to addressing spiritual needs, such as not having the right vocabulary. The ars moriendi model might be a feasible tool for spiritual history taking in palliative care. Aim To investigate the effect of a structured spiritual history taking on the spiritual well-being of palliative patients in home care. Design Cluster randomized controlled trial, conducted between February and October 2013. Patients and methods Registered nurses and general practitioners approached eligible patients with an incurable, life-threatening disease for study participation. Health-care providers allocated to the intervention arm of the study took a spiritual history on the basis of the ars moriendi model. Health-care providers in the control arm provided care as usual. Patient-reported outcomes on spiritual well-being, quality of life, pain, and patient-provider trust were assessed at two points in time. Results A total of 245 health-care providers participated in the study (204 nurses and 41 physicians). In all, 49 patient-provider dyads completed the entire study protocol. The median age of the patients was 75 years (range: 41-95 years), and 55% of the patients were female. There were no significant differences at any point in time in the scores on spiritual well-being, quality of life, pain, or patient-provider trust between the intervention and the control group. Conclusion This cluster randomized controlled trial showed no demonstrable e…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269216315601953

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vermandere, M., Warmenhoven, F., Van Severen, E., De Lepeleire, J., & Aertgeerts, B.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Department of General Practice, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Corresponding author
Vermandere, Mieke
Venue
Palliative Medicine
Published
2015-09-16
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
338-350
ISSN
  • 0269-2163 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-030X
OpenAlex
W2332723707
Cited by
67
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Funders
KU Leuven
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
spiritual history taking, palliative care, home care, spiritual well-being, quality of life, pain, physician-patient trust, spiritual needs, nurses, general practitioners
MeSH terms
Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude of Health Personnel, Communication Barriers, Female, Home Care Services, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Palliative Care, Professional-Patient Relations, Quality of Life, Terminally Ill, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review