Cited by 33Ethics in Clinical ResearchPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesHealth Policy Implementation Science

Using the ‘Social Marketing Mix Framework’ to explore recruitment barriers and facilitators in palliative care randomised controlled trials? A narrative synthesis review

Open access
Dunleavy, Lesley, Walshe, Catherine, Oriani, Anna, Preston, Nancy·2018·Palliative Medicine

Abstract

Background: Effective recruitment to randomised controlled trials is critically important for a robust, trustworthy evidence base in palliative care. Many trials fail to achieve recruitment targets, but the reasons for this are poorly understood. Understanding barriers and facilitators is a critical step in designing optimal recruitment strategies. Aim: To identify, explore and synthesise knowledge about recruitment barriers and facilitators in palliative care trials using the ‘6 Ps’ of the ‘Social Marketing Mix Framework’. Design: A systematic review with narrative synthesis. Data sources: Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Embase databases (from January 1990 to early October 2016) were searched. Papers included the following: interventional and qualitative studies addressing recruitment, palliative care randomised controlled trial papers or reports containing narrative observations about the barriers, facilitators or strategies to increase recruitment. Results: A total of 48 papers met the inclusion criteria. Uninterested participants (Product), burden of illness (Price) and ‘identifying eligible participants’ were barriers. Careful messaging and the use of scripts/role play (Promotion) were recommended. The need for intensive resources and gatekeeping by professionals were barriers while having research staff on-site and lead clinician support (Working with Partners) was advocated. Most evidence is based on researchers’ own reports of experiences of recruiting to trials rather than independent evaluation. Conclusion: The ‘Social Marketing Mix Framework’ can help guide researchers when planning and implementing their recruitment strategy but suggested strategies need to be tested within embedded clinical trials. The findings of this review are applicable to all palliative care research and not just randomised controlled trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269216318757623

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Challenges associated with recruitment and retention of participants in palliative care studies are widely recognised, with factors such as deteriorating health, feelings of being overwhelmed, and fatigue contributing to low levels of recruitment and retention.

    “Challenges associated with recruitment and retention of participants in palliative care studies are widely recognised, with factors such as deteriorating health, feelings of being overwhelmed, and fatigue, all contributing to low levels of recruitment and retention.71,72”

    From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for people with advanced progressive illness, their caregivers and staff involved in their care: A scoping review. (2023) · cites this paper as [72]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Aveyard H, Payne , S and Preston, N. A Post-graduate's Guide to Doing a Literature Review: in Health and Social Care Open University Press, 2016, p.113.
  2. Abernethy AP, Currow DC, Wurzelmann J, et al. Enhancing enrollment in palliative care trials: key insights from a randomized, placebo-controlled study. The journal of supportive oncology 2010; 8: 139-144. 2010/06/18.
  3. Buss MK, DuBenske LL, Dinauer S, et al. Patient/caregiver influences for declining participation in supportive oncology trials. Journal of Supportive Oncology 2008; 6: 168-174.
  4. Catherine Walshe and Nancy Preston are Lesley Dunleavy's PhD supervisors. They have provided support throughout the development of this paper as well as critical review and suggestions for improvement. http://mc.http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/palliative-medicine Page 51 of 57 Palliative Medicine http://mc.http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/palliative-medicine Palliative Medicine Page 52 of 57

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dunleavy, L., Walshe, C., Oriani, A., & Preston, N.
Affiliations
Lancaster University (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Walshe, Catherine
  • Oriani, Anna
  • Preston, Nancy
Venue
Palliative Medicine
Published
2018-02-27
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
990-1009
ISSN
  • 0269-2163 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-030X
OpenAlex
W2789026213
Cited by
33
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Lancaster University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
trial recruitment, recruitment barriers, palliative care research, role play, clinician support, disease burden
MeSH terms
Humans, Palliative Care, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Patient Selection, Qualitative Research, Social Marketing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review