Cited by 77Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Brief psychosocial interventions improve quality of life of patients receiving palliative care: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Warth, Marco, Kessler, Jens, Koehler, Friederike, Aguilar-Raab, Corina, Bardenheuer, Hubert J., Ditzen, Beate·2019·Palliative Medicine

Abstract

Background: Patients with a terminal disease report a high need for psychosocial and spiritual support. Previous literature reviews on psychosocial interventions in palliative care were restricted to certain subtypes of techniques, included a wide range of patients, conditions, and settings, or required a number of sessions unrealistic to be achieved in patients nearing the end of their lives. Aim: The aim of this study was to review and synthesize the evidence on brief psychosocial interventions (i.e. four sessions or less and less than 21 days) for patients receiving palliative treatment. Design: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with standard guidelines and a pre-registered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42018082713). Data sources: Electronic databases, journals, and references were searched for controlled clinical trials. We used the Cochrane criteria to assess the risk of bias within studies. Results: In total, 15 studies met the eligibility criteria and reported the effects of 17 interventions and a total of 1248 patients. The most frequently used techniques were life review techniques and music therapy. After exclusion of outliers, psychosocial interventions showed to be superior with regard to the improvement of quality of life (effect size = 0.36, confidence interval = 0.08 to 0.64), and the reduction of emotional (effect size = −0.51, confidence interval = −0.77 to −0.26) and existential distress (effect size = −0.40, confidence interval = −0.71 to −0.07) compared to the control groups. Conclusion: Brief psychosocial interventions can improve clinically relevant health outcomes and should therefore be made available for patients receiving palliative care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269216318818011

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [8]Bausewein C, Roller R and Volz R. Konzept der Palliativmedizin. In: Bausewein C, Roller R and Volz R (eds) Leitfaden Palliative Care: Palliativmedizin und Warth et al. 343 Hospizbetreuung. München: Urban und Fischer, 2010, pp. 1–56.
  2. [12]Rome RB, Luminais HH, Bourgeois DA, et al. The role of pal-liative care at the end of life. Ochsner J 2011; 11(4): 348– 352.
  3. [17]Korczak D, Wastian M and Schneider M. Music therapy in palliative setting. GMS Health Technol Assess 2013; 9: 1–6.
  4. [72]Domingo JP, Matamoros NE, Danés CF, et al. Effectiveness of music therapy in advanced cancer patients admitted to a palliative care unit: a non-randomized controlled, clinical trial. Music Med 2015; 7: 23–31.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Warth, M., Kessler, J., Koehler, F., Aguilar-Raab, C., Bardenheuer, H. J., & Ditzen, B.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
  • Institute of Medical Psychology, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Corresponding author
Warth, Marco
Venue
Palliative Medicine
Published
2019-01-16
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
332-345
ISSN
  • 0269-2163 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-030X
OpenAlex
W2909846972
Cited by
77
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • heiDOK (Heidelberg University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • MADOC (University of Mannheim) (submittedVersion)
  • University Library Heidelberg
Funders
  • Stiftung Sonnen-Blau. Gemeinnützige Morgott-Schupp-Stiftung für frühkindliche Erziehung und Palliativversorgung
  • Medical Faculty Heidelberg
  • H.W. & J. Hector Stiftung
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
brief psychosocial intervention, palliative care, quality of life, life review, music therapy, emotional distress, existential suffering, terminal illness, spiritual support
MeSH terms
Respect, Humans, Palliative Care, Patients, Quality of Life, Terminal Care, Terminally Ill, Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review