Cited by 36Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychedelics and Drug StudiesHallucinations in medical conditions

Perceptual organization in ketamine users: preliminary evidence of deficits on night of drug use but not 3 days later

Uhlhaas, Peter J., Millard, Isobel, Muetzelfeldt, Leslie, Curran, H. Valerie, Morgan, CeLia J.A.·2007·Journal of Psychopharmacology

Abstract

N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor antagonists such as ketamine can induce transient schizophrenia-like symptoms and cognitive dysfunctions in healthy volunteers similar to those observed in patients with schizophrenia. Perceptual organization deficits have been documented in schizophrenia and are thought to be related to some symptoms associated with the illness. The current study was designed to determine whether people who repeatedly self-administer ketamine would also show deficits in perceptual organization. Using a psychophysically well-controlled measure of contour integration, we compared a group of recreational users (n = 16) to a group of poly-drug using controls (n = 16). Contour integration performance was measured on the night of drug use and 3 days later when drug free. The results showed that on the night of drug use, ketamine produced a dysfunction in contour integration however, this was not present 3 days later when drug free. Levels of dissociation were also higher in ketamine users only on the night of drug use. These preliminary data provide some support for the role of NMDA-receptor hypofunctioning in dysfunctional coordination of cognitive activity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269881107077739

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ketamine's effects include loss of perceptual organization.

    “its effects include loss of perceptual organization (Uhlhaas et al., 2007)”

    From The Computational Anatomy of Psychosis (2013) · cites this paper as Uhlhaas et al., 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uhlhaas, P. J., Millard, I., Muetzelfeldt, L., Curran, H. V., & Morgan, C. J. A.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Brain Research (DE)
  • Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, UCL, London, UK.
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Morgan, CeLia J.A.
Venue
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Published
2007-05
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
347-352
ISSN
  • 0269-8811 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7285
OpenAlex
W1974169044
Cited by
36
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (RES-000-23-0945)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
Keywords
ketamine, perceptual organization, contour integration, NMDA receptor antagonists, recreational drug use, dissociation, schizophrenia-like symptoms, cognitive impairment, polydrug use
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Amnesia, Delusions, Depersonalization, Dissociative Disorders, Female, Humans, Ketamine, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Perception, Psychomotor Performance, Visual Perception, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review