Cited by 191Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Stimulus configuration and context effects in perceptual organization in schizophrenia

Silverstein, Steven M., Knight, Raymond A., Schwarzkopf, Steven B., West, Laura L., Osborn, Leah M., Kamin, Don·1996·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

Two studies assessed perceptual organization in schizophrenia to determine (a) whether inpatient and outpatient groups with poor premorbid schizophrenia have comparable levels of perceptual organization deficit; and (b) whether the deficit could be eliminated by task manipulations. In Study 1, inpatients demonstrated clear evidence of a perceptual organization deficit, whereas outpatients performed similarly to the control groups. In Study 2, a performance pattern that operationally defined a perceptual organization deficit was eliminated by a task manipulation thought to aid in context processing. The perceptual organization deficit is most pronounced in actively symptomatic patients with poor premorbid schizophrenia, and the deficit reflects, in part, deficient top-down influences to basic perceptual processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-843x.105.3.410

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Impairments in visual integration have been linked to poorer premorbid social functioning.

    “Impairments in visual integration have been linked to increases in disorganized symptoms (57,66,67), poorer premorbid social functioning (82), presence of childhood trauma in schizophrenia (83), and illness severity and chronicity (84).”

    From Visual perception and its impairment in schizophrenia (2008) · cites this paper as [82]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Silverstein, S. M., Knight, R. A., Schwarzkopf, S. B., West, L. L., Osborn, L. M., & Kamin, D.
Affiliations
University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
1996-08
Volume
105
Issue
3
Pages
410-420
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2063723431
Cited by
191
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
perceptual organization, schizophrenia, stimulus configuration, context effects, premorbid functioning, inpatient versus outpatient comparison, top-down processing, perceptual deficits
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Discrimination Learning, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Perceptual Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychomotor Performance, Psychotic Disorders, Reaction Time, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Schizotypal Personality Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review