Cited by 56Eating Disorders and BehaviorsRegulation of Appetite and ObesityPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

Effects of lisdexamfetamine in a rat model of binge-eating

Vickers, Steven P, Hackett, David, Murray, Fraser, Hutson, Peter H, Heal, David J·2015·Journal of Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Binge-eating disorder is a common psychiatric disorder affecting ~2% of adults. Binge-eating was initiated in freely-fed, lean, adult, female rats by giving unpredictable, intermittent access to ground, milk chocolate over four weeks. The rats avidly consumed chocolate during 2hr binge sessions, with compensatory reductions of normal chow intake in these sessions and the days thereafter. Bodyweights of binge-eating rats were normal. The model’s predictive validity was explored using nalmefene (0.1–1.0mg/kg), R-baclofen (1.0–10mg/kg) and SB-334867 (3.0–30mg/kg) (orexin-1 antagonist), which all selectively decreased chocolate bingeing without reducing chow intake. Sibutramine (0.3–5.0mg/kg) non-selectively reduced chocolate and chow consumption. Olanzapine (0.3–3.0mg/kg) was without effect and rolipram (1.0–10mg/kg) abolished all ingestive behaviour. The pro-drug, lisdexamfetamine (LDX; 0.1–1.5mg/kg), dose-dependently reduced chocolate bingeing by ⩽71% without significantly decreasing normal chow intake. Its metabolite, d-amphetamine (0.1–1.0mg/kg), dose-dependently and preferentially decreased chocolate bingeing ⩽56%. Using selective antagonists to characterize LDX’s actions revealed the reduction of chocolate bingeing was partially blocked by prazosin (α 1 -adrenoceptor; 0.3 and 1.0mg/kg) and possibly by SCH-23390 (D 1 ; 0.1mg/kg). RX821002 (α 2 -adrenoceptor; 0.1 and 0.3mg/kg) and raclopride (D 2 ; 0.3 and 0.5mg/kg) were without effect. The results indicate that LDX, via its metabolite, d-amphetamine, reduces chocolate bingeing, partly by indirect activation of α 1 -adrenoceptors and perhaps D 1 receptors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269881115615107

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vickers, S. P., Hackett, D., Murray, F., Hutson, P. H., & Heal, D. J.
Affiliations
  • RenaSci Ltd, BioCity, Nottingham, UK
  • Shire (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Shire Development Inc, Wayne, PA, USA
  • RenaSci (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Heal, David J
Venue
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Published
2015-11-20
Volume
29
Issue
12
Pages
1290-1307
ISSN
  • 0269-8811 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7285
OpenAlex
W2175276690
Cited by
56
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
lisdexamfetamine, binge eating, binge eating disorder, d-amphetamine, alpha1-adrenoceptors, dopamine D1 receptor, prazosin, nalmefene, baclofen, sibutramine, olanzapine, rolipram, rat model, compulsive eating
MeSH terms
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate, Olanzapine, Animals, Baclofen, Behavior, Animal, Benzazepines, Benzodiazepines, Body Weight, Bulimia, Disease Models, Animal, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Female, Naltrexone, Prazosin, Prodrugs, Rats, Wistar, Idazoxan, Rolipram, Raclopride, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review