Cited by 123Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports

Time for “The Talk” . . . Now What? Autonomy Support and Structure in Mother-Daughter Conversations About Sex

Mauras, Carrie P., Grolnick, Wendy S., Friendly, Rachel W.·2013·The Journal of Early Adolescence

Abstract

This study explored how mothers communicated with their young adolescent daughters about the high-stakes topic of sex, as well as more everyday topics, from a Self-Determination Theory perspective. Mothers and their 11- to 14-year-old daughters (44 dyads) participated in two conversations and reported on their experiences. In the everyday conversation, maternal autonomy support was positively related to daughters’ experience, engagement, and desire for additional conversations. In the sex conversation, maternal structure was positively associated with daughters’ engagement, experience, and desire for additional conversations. Mothers were less autonomy supportive in conversations about sex, as compared to everyday topics. Maternal perceptions of threat were associated with less autonomy support in both conversations and worry during the conversation was negatively associated with autonomy support in the everyday conversation, and with structure in the sex conversation. Implications for intervention are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0272431612449385

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Parental autonomy support and control manifest differently during a puzzle solving task with toddlers versus during a conversation about sexuality or friendships with adolescents.

    “To illustrate, parental autonomy support and control manifest differently during a puzzle solving task with toddlers (e.g., Bernier et al. 2010) versus during a conversation about sexuality (Mauras et al. 2013) or friendships with adolescents (e.g., Wuyts et al. 2018).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 123

Authors
Mauras, C. P., Grolnick, W. S., & Friendly, R. W.
Affiliations
Clark University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Early Adolescence
Published
2012-06-21
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
458-481
ISSN
  • 0272-4316 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5449
OpenAlex
W2151740254
Cited by
123
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Early Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • Clark Digital Commons (Clark University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Keywords
sex talk, autonomy support, structure, self-determination theory, adolescent sexuality, maternal communication, threat perception, maternal worry, parent-adolescent relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review