Cited by 104Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeMarkov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods

Markov Chain Monte Carlo Estimation of a Multiparameter Decision Model: Consistency of Evidence and the Accurate Assessment of Uncertainty

Ades, A.E., Cliffe, S.·2002·Medical Decision Making

Abstract

Decision models are usually populated 1 parameter at a time, with 1 item of information informing each parameter. Often, however, data may not be available on the parameters themselves but on several functions of parameters, and there may be more items of information than there are parameters to be estimated. The authors show how in these circumstances all the model parameters can be estimated simultaneously using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Consistency of the information and/or the adequacy of the model can also be assessed within this framework. Statistical evidence synthesis using all available data should result in more precise estimates of parameters and functions of parameters, and is compatible with the emphasis currently placed on systematic use of evidence. To illustrate this, WinBUGS software is used to estimate a simple 9-parameter model of the epidemiology of HIV in women attending prenatal clinics, using information on 12 functions of parameters, and to thereby compute the expected net benefit of 2 alternative prenatal testing strategies, universal testing and targeted testing of high-risk groups. The authors demonstrate improved precision of estimates, and lower estimates of the expected value of perfect information, resulting from the use of all available data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/027298902400448920

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ades, A. E., & Cliffe, S.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Venue
Medical Decision Making
Published
2002-07-01
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
359-371
ISSN
  • 0272-989X (ISSN-L)
  • 0000-0000
OpenAlex
W2130761965
Cited by
104
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
8.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Decision Making (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
Keywords
Markov chain Monte Carlo, Bayesian parameter estimation, uncertainty analysis, evidence synthesis, value of perfect information, WinBUGS
MeSH terms
Adult, Bayes Theorem, Computer Simulation, Female, Humans, Markov Chains, Mathematical Computing, Monte Carlo Method, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Software, AIDS Serodiagnosis, HIV Infections, Evidence-Based Medicine, Decision Support Systems, Clinical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review