Markov Chain Monte Carlo Estimation of a Multiparameter Decision Model: Consistency of Evidence and the Accurate Assessment of Uncertainty
Abstract
Decision models are usually populated 1 parameter at a time, with 1 item of information informing each parameter. Often, however, data may not be available on the parameters themselves but on several functions of parameters, and there may be more items of information than there are parameters to be estimated. The authors show how in these circumstances all the model parameters can be estimated simultaneously using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Consistency of the information and/or the adequacy of the model can also be assessed within this framework. Statistical evidence synthesis using all available data should result in more precise estimates of parameters and functions of parameters, and is compatible with the emphasis currently placed on systematic use of evidence. To illustrate this, WinBUGS software is used to estimate a simple 9-parameter model of the epidemiology of HIV in women attending prenatal clinics, using information on 12 functions of parameters, and to thereby compute the expected net benefit of 2 alternative prenatal testing strategies, universal testing and targeted testing of high-risk groups. The authors demonstrate improved precision of estimates, and lower estimates of the expected value of perfect information, resulting from the use of all available data.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This Bayesian evidence synthesis approach involves specification of a structure comprising inputs and parameters that are functions of multiple inputs, for which an external data source exists.
“This approach involves specification of a structure comprising inputs and parameters that are functions of multiple inputs, for which an external data source exists [17].”
From Model Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-6 (2012) · cites this paper as [17]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Briggs, A. H., Weinstein, M. C., Fenwick, E. A. L., Karnon, J., Sculpher, M. J., & Paltiel, A. D. (2012) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.04.014 · Cited by 711 · see citing works
Price, M. J., Ades, A., Soldan, K., Welton, N. J., Macleod, J., Simms, I., DeAngelis, D., Turner, K. M., & Horner, P. J. (2016) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta20220 · Cited by 494 · see citing works
Self-citationStevenson, M., Scope, A., Sutcliffe, P., Booth, A., Slade, P., Parry, G., Saxon, D., & Kalthenthaler, E. (2010) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta14440 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ades, A. E., & Cliffe, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- ORCID
- Ades, A.E.
- Venue
- Medical Decision Making
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-07-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 359-371
- ISSN
- 0272-989X (ISSN-L)
- 0000-0000
- OpenAlex
- W2130761965
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 8.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Decision Making (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
- Keywords
- Markov chain Monte Carlo, Bayesian parameter estimation, uncertainty analysis, evidence synthesis, value of perfect information, WinBUGS
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Bayes Theorem, Computer Simulation, Female, Humans, Markov Chains, Mathematical Computing, Monte Carlo Method, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Software, AIDS Serodiagnosis, HIV Infections, Evidence-Based Medicine, Decision Support Systems, Clinical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review