Cited by 57Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumDigital Mental Health InterventionsMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Group Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Postnatal Depression: A Systematic Review of Clinical Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness and Value of Information Analyses

Open access
Stevenson, MD, Scope, A, Sutcliffe, PA, Booth, A, Slade, P, Parry, G, Saxon, D, Kalthenthaler, E·2010·Health Technology Assessment

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postnatal depression (PND) describes a wide range of distressing symptoms that can occur in women following childbirth. There is substantial evidence to support the use of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) in the treatment of depression, and psychological therapies are recommended by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence as a first-line treatment for PND. However, access is limited owing to expense, waiting lists and availability of therapists. Group CBT may, therefore, offer a solution to these problems by reducing therapist time and increasing the number of available places for treatment. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of group CBT compared with currently used packages of care for women with PND. DATA SOURCES: Seventeen electronic bibliographic databases were searched (for example MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, EMBASE, PsycINFO, etc.), covering biomedical, health-related, science, social science and grey literature (including current research). Databases were searched from 1950 to January 2008. In addition, the reference lists of relevant articles were checked and various health services' related resources were consulted via the internet. REVIEW METHODS: The study population included women in the postpartum period (up to 1 year), meeting the criteria of a standardised PND diagnosis using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition, or scoring above cut-off on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). No exclusion was made on the basis of the standardised depression screening/case finding instrument of standardised clinical assessment tool used to define PND. All full papers were read by two reviewers (AS and DS) who made independent decisions regarding inclusion or exclusion, and consensus, where possible, was obtained by meeting to compare decisions. In the event of disagreement, a third reviewer (EK) read the paper and made the decision. All data from included quantitative studies were extracted by one reviewer (AS) using a standardised data extraction form. All data from included qualitative studies were extracted by two reviewers (AS and AB) using a standardised data extraction form with disagreements resolved by discussion. Two different data extraction forms were used, one for the quantitative papers and a second for the qualitative papers. RESULTS: Six studies met the inclusion criteria for the quantitative review. Three were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and three were non-randomised trials. Two studies met the inclusion criteria for the qualitative review. These were both treatment evaluations incorporating qualitative methods. Only one study was deemed appropriate for the decision problem; therefore a meta-analysis was not performed. This study indicated that the reduction in the EPDS score through group CBT compared with routine primary care (RPC) was 3.48 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23 to 6.73] at the end of the treatment period. At 6-month follow-up the relative reduction in EPDS score was 4.48 (95% CI 1.01 to 7.95). Three studies showed the treatment to be effective in reducing depression when compared to RPC, usual care or waiting list groups. There was no adequate evidence on which to assess group CBT compared with other treatments for PND. Two studies of group CBT for PND were included in the qualitative review. Both studies demonstrated patient acceptability of group CBT for PND, although negative feelings towards group CBT were also identified. A de novo economic model was constructed to assess the cost-effectiveness of group CBT. The base-case results indicated a cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of 46,462 pounds for group CBT compared with RPC. The 95% CI for this ratio ranged from 37,008 to 60,728 pounds. There was considerable uncertainty in the cost per woman of running a CBT course, of the appropriateness of efficacy data to the decision problem, and the residual length of benefit associated with group CBT. These were tested using univariate sensitivity analyses. Supplementary analyses that fitted distributions to the cost of treatment and the duration of comparative advantage reported a cost per QALY of 36,062 pounds (95% CI 20,464 to 59,262 pounds). LIMITATIONS: The cost per QALY ratio for group CBT in PND was uncertain because of gaps in the evidence base. There was little quantitative or qualitative RCT evidence to assess the effectiveness of group CBT for PND. The evidence that was available was of low quality in the main because of poor reporting of the results. Furthermore, little information was reported on concurrent treatment used in the studies, which was controlled for in only two of the studies. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from the clinical effectiveness review provided inconsistent and low quality information on which to base any interpretations for service provision. Although three of the included studies provided so

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3310/hta14440

Cites

217 of 217 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These forms of support are important for normalizing the challenges and self-doubt new mothers often experience and can help decrease isolation.

    “These forms of support are important for normalizing the challenges and self-doubt new mothers often experience and can help decrease isolation [24].”

    From Motherhood and Me (Mom-Me): The Development of an Acceptance-Based Group for Women with Postpartum Mood and Anxiety Symptoms (2022) · cites this paper as [24]

    The review’s “Social comparisons” section reports that women in a postnatal-depression group felt their distressing thoughts were normal when they met others with the same condition (quoted study, p. 431). Its “Community” section reports reduced isolation (quoted study, p. 430). These findings support the benefits of group support for women with postnatal depression, but do not establish them for new mothers generally or for unspecified forms of support. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Group programs offer positive benefits, such as emotional, informational, and social support.

    “Group programs offer positive benefits, such as emotional, informational, and social support.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

64 of the 281 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 79

  1. Milgrom J, Martin PR, Negri LM. Treating postnatal depression. A psychological approach for health care practitioners. England: Wiley; 1999.
  2. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Scottish Executive Health Department, Department of Health, and Social Services and Public Safety, Northern Ireland. Why mothers die 1997-1999. The fifth report of the confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. London: RCOG Press; 2001.
  3. Cooper PJ, Murray L. Postnatal depression. BMJ 1998;316:1884-6.
  4. Morrell CJ, Slade P, Warner R, Paley G, Dixon S, Walters SJ, et al. Clincial effectiveness of health visitor training in psychologically informed approaches for depression in postnatal women: pragmatic cluster randomised trial in primary care. BMJ 2009;338:1-10.
  5. O'Hara M. The nature of postpartum depressive disorders. In Murray L, Cooper P, editors. Postpartum depression and child development. New York, NY: Guildford; 1997: 3-31.
  6. O'Hara M, Schlechte J, Lewis D, Wright E. Prospective study of postpartum blues: Biologic and psychosocial factors. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1991;48:801-6.
  7. Healthcare Commission towards better births. A review of maternity services in England. Service Review. London: Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection; 2008.
  8. Appleby L, Warner R, Whitton AF, Faragher B. A controlled study of fluxetine and cognitive- behavioral counselling in the treatment of postnatal depression. BMJ 1997;314:932-6.
  9. Ades AE, Lu G, Claxton K. Expected values of sample information calculation in medical decision making. Med Decis Making 2004;24:207-27.
  10. Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression: Development of the 10- item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry 1987;150:782-6.
  11. Davies S, Jasper M. A first-stage evaluation of a group programme for PND. Community Pract 2004;77:426-33.
  12. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodolgical quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998;52:377-84.
  13. Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company, Inc.; 2007.
  14. Duskin C. Experiences of social comparison in a postpartum depression support group. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering 2006;67:539.
  15. Pitts F. Professional. Health visiting: the Monday group: postnatal depression revisited. Community Pract 1999;72:327-9.
  16. Eastwood P. Group work 1. Promoting peer group support with postnatally depressed women. Health Visit 1995;68:148-50.
  17. Tanner BA. A multidimensional client satisfaction instrument. Eval Program Plann 1982;5:161-7.
  18. unit adj cost$).mp. 17. or/1-16 References for Table 48 Counseling to prevent postnatal emotional problems. Nurses Drug Alert 2007;31:40. Groups don't help postnatal blues. Aust Nurs J 1996;3:16. Psychological intervention for postpartum depression. Nurses Drug Alert 2006;30:39.
  19. Abramov L, Zohar AH. A controlled community-based family study of major depression with postpartum onset. Am J Med Genet 1998;81:455-6.
  20. Appleby L, Warner R, Whitton AF, Faragher B. A controlled study of fluxetine and cognitive-behavioral counselling in the treatment of postnatal depression. BMJ 1997;314:932-6.
  21. Appleby L. Fluoxetine vs counselling for postnatal depression. N Z Med J 1997;110:221.
  22. Berchtold N, Burrough M. Reaching out: depression after delivery support group network. NAACOGS Clin Issu Perinat Womens Health Nurs 1990;1:385-94.
  23. Casiano ME. Outpatient medical management of postpartum psychiatric disorders. NAACOGS Clin Issu Perinat Womens Health Nurs 1990;1:395-401.
  24. Chung P, Yue X. Postpartum depression and social support: A comparative study in Hong Kong. Psychologia 1999;42:111-21.
  25. Chun L-Q, Bo X, Wen J-X. A controlled clinical trial of citalopram and citalopram combined with psychotherapy in the treatment of postpartum depression. Chinese Mental Health Journal 2005;19:847-8.
  26. Cooper P, Murray L. The impact of psychological treatments of postpartum depression on maternal mood and infant development. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1997. pp. 201-20.
  27. Elliott S, Sanjack M, Leverton T. Parents groups in pregnancy: A preventive intervention for postnatal depression? In Gottlieb B, editor. Marshalling social support: formats, processes and effects. London: Sage; 1988. pp. 86-110.
  28. Fairchild M. Women with postpartum psychiatric illness: A professionally facilitated support group. Soc Work Groups 1995;18:41-53.
  29. Gutteridge K. Postnatal depression --an integrative psychotherapeutic group approach. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest 2002;12:85-8.
  30. Honikman J. Role of self-help techniques for postpartum mood disorders. Washington, DC, US: American Psychiatric Association; 1999. pp. 195-215.
  31. Johnston D, Tough S, Siever J. The Community Perinatal Care Study: home visiting and nursing support for pregnant women. Zero Three 2006;27:11-17.
  32. Klier CM, Muzik M, Rosenblum K, Lenz G. Interpersonal psychotherapy adapted for the group setting in the treatment of postpartum depression: A pilot study. Infant Ment Health J 2000;21:381.
  33. Lau Y. Establishing an interpersonal group therapy program for Chinese women with postnatal depression in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Nurs J 2005;41:7-17.
  34. Lockhart K. Karitane mothers' post partum support group. Lamp 1988;45:11-12.
  35. Markou P. Psychotherapeutic support group for the partners of women with post natal depression. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 1999;33:A19.
  36. Milgrom J, Negri L, Meager I. Group treatment for post- partum depression. Int J Psychol 1996;31:1203.
  37. Milgrom J, Negri L, McNeil M, Martin P. A randomized trial of psychological treatments for postnatal depression. Int J Psychol 2004;39:509.
  38. Murray L, Cooper PJ, Wilson A, Romaniuk H. Controlled trial of the short-and long-term effect of psychological treatment of post-partum depression: 2. Impact on the mother-child relationship and child outcome. Br J Psychiatry 2003;182:420-7.
  39. O'Brien LM, Boath E, Hodgson R, Cox JL. The long- term follow-up of women treated for postnatal depression at a specialist day hospital compared to routine primary care. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract 2002;6:199-203.
  40. Olson MR, Cutler LA, Legault F. Bittersweet: a postpartum depression support group. Can J Public Health 1991;82:135-6.
  41. Prendergast J, Austin M. Early childhood nurse-delivered cognitive behavioural counselling for post-natal depression. Australas Psychiatry 2001;9:255-9.
  42. Spinelli M. Interpersonal psychotherapy for antepartum depressed women. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press; 2001. pp. 105-21.
  43. Stuart S, O'Hara M. Interpersonal psychotherapy for postpartum depression: A treatment program. J Psychother Pract Res 1995;4:18-29.
  44. Stuart S, O'Hara M. The efficacy of psychotherapy for perinatal depression. Econ Neurosci 2001;3:46-51.
  45. Wilkinson J, Phillips S, Jackson J, Walker K. "Mad for fitness": an exercise group to combat a high incidence of postnatal depression. J Fam Health Care 2003;13:44-8.
  46. Wheatley SL, Brugha TS, Shapiro DA, Berryman JC. PATA PATA: midwives' experiences of facilitating a psychological intervention to identify and treat mild to moderate antenatal and postnatal depression… Positive Attitude Towards Antenatal and Postnatal Adjustment, Training for All. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest 2003;13:523-30.
  47. Zlotnick C, Miller I, Pearlstein T, Howard M, Sweeney P. A preventive intervention for pregnant women on public assistance at risk for postpartum depression. Am J Psychiatry 2006;163:1443-5. References for Table 50
  48. Davies S, Jasper M. A first-stage evaluation of a group programme for PND. Community Pract 2004;77:426-33.
  49. Eastwood P. Group work 1. Promoting peer group support with postnatally depressed women. Health Visit 1995;68:148-50.
  50. Klier C, Muzik M, Rosenblum K, Lenz G. Interpersonal psychotherapy adapted for the group setting in the treatment of postpartum depression. J Psychother Pract Res 2001;10:124-31.
  51. MacInnes A. Findings of a community-based group for women with PND. Community Pract 2000;73:754-6.
  52. May A. Group work 2. Using exercise to tackle postnatal depression. Health Visit 1995;68:146-7.
  53. Morgan M, Matthey S, Barnett B, Richardson C. A group programme for postnatally distressed women and their partners. J Adv Nurs 1997;26:913-20.
  54. Pitts F. Professional. Health visiting: the Monday group: postnatal depression revisited. Community Pract 1999;72:327-9.
  55. Ahmad T, Suleiman R, Shougah D. Mixed anxiety depression in pregnancy: (The influence of misconceptions). Arab Journal of Psychiatry 1994;5:103-13.
  56. Amankwaa L. Enduring: A grounded theory investigation of postpartum depression among African-American women. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering 2000;61:1317.
  57. Buchwald J, Unterman R. Precursors and predictors of postpartum depression: A retrospective study. J Prev Psychiatry 1982;1:293-308.
  58. Campbell SB, Cohn JF, Meyers T. Depression in first- time mothers -mother-infant interaction and depression chronicity. Dev Psychol 1995;31:349-57.
  59. Campbell S, Cohn J. The timing and chronicity of postpartum depression: Implications for infant development. In: Murray L, Cooper P, editors. Postpartum depression and child development. New York, NY: Guildford; 1997. pp. 165-97.
  60. Clemmens DA. Adolescent mothers' depression after the birth of their babies: weathering the storm. Adolescence 2002;37:551-65.
  61. Creedy D. Postnatal depression and post traumatic stress disorder: what are the links? Birth Issues 1999;8:125-30.
  62. Cubison J, Munro J. Acceptability of Using the EPDS as a Screening Tool for Postnatal Depression. Psychology: Professional & Research Language. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2005. pp. 152-161.
  63. Gaff-Smith M. The relationship between self-esteem, social support and postnatal depression in adolescent mothers in rural New South Wales. Birth Issues 2003;12:69-75.
  64. Garel M, Dardennes M, Blondel B. Mothers' psychological distress 1 year after very preterm childbirth. Results of the epipage qualitative study. Child Care Health Dev 2007;33:137-43.
  65. Hall P. Mothers' experiences of postnatal depression: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Community Pract 2006;79:256-60.
  66. Hanley J. The emotional wellbeing of Bangladeshi mothers during the postnatal period. Community Pract 2007;80:34-7.
  67. Horowitz JA, Chang SS, Das S, Hayes B. Women's perceptions of postpartum depressive symptoms from an international perspective. International Nursing Perspectives 2001;1:5-14.
  68. Kane H. Emotion work, labeling, and gender in post- partum and post-adoptive depression. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences 2006;67:3996.
  69. Ketler S. Separating mothering and motherhood: Women's changing maternity experiences and the normalization of postpartum depression in Cagliari, Italy, 1943-1994. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences 1997;58:4327.
  70. Lauer W. Postpartum depression: A phenomenological exploration of the woman's experience. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering 2001;62:2064.
  71. Lawler D, Sinclair M. Grieving for my former self: a phenomenological hermeneutical study of women's lived experience of postnatal depression. Evidence Based Midwifery 2003;1:36-41.
  72. Poole H, Mason L, Osborn T. Women's views of being screened for postnatal depression. Community Pract 2006;79:363-7.
  73. Shakespeare J. Health visitor screening for PND using the EPDS: a process study. Community Pract 2002; 75:381-4.
  74. Shakespeare J, Blake F, Garcia J. A qualitative study of the acceptability of routine screening of postnatal women using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Gen Pract 2003;53:614-19.
  75. Templeton L, Velleman R, Persaud A, Milner P. The experiences of postnatal depression in women from black and minority ethnic communities in Wiltshire, UK. Ethn Health 2003;8:207-21.
  76. Thomas H. Women's postnatal experience following a medically complicated pregnancy. Health Care Women Int 2004;25:76-87.
  77. Thurtle V. First time mothers' perceptions of motherhood and PND. Community Pract 2003;76:261-5.
  78. Uddenberg N, Englesson I. Prognosis of post partum mental disturbance: A prospective study of primiparous women and their 4-year-old children. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1978;58:201-12.
  79. Williamson V, McCutcheon H. Postnatal blues. Singapore Nursing Journal 2002;29:32-6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stevenson, M., Scope, A., Sutcliffe, P., Booth, A., Slade, P., Parry, G., Saxon, D., & Kalthenthaler, E.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Stevenson, MD
Venue
Health Technology Assessment
Published
2010-09
Volume
14
Issue
44
Pages
1-107, iii
ISSN
  • 1366-5278 (ISSN-L)
  • 2046-4924
OpenAlex
W1993177000
Cited by
57
References
281
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Technology Assessment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Health Technology Assessment programme (06/83/01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
postpartum depression, group cognitive behavioral therapy, clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, value of information, psychotherapy, postpartum period, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, access to mental health care, waiting lists, therapist availability, treatment evaluation, treatment acceptability, barriers to treatment, relapse, relapse prevention
MeSH terms
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Psychotherapy, Group, State Medicine, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Depression, Postpartum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review