Cited by 364Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

Expected Value of Sample Information Calculations in Medical Decision Modeling

Ades, A. E., Lu, G., Claxton, K.·2004·Medical Decision Making

Abstract

There has been an increasing interest in using expected value of information (EVI) theory in medical decision making, to identify the need for further research to reduce uncertainty in decision and as a tool for sensitivity analysis. Expected value of sample information (EVSI) has been proposed for determination of optimum sample size and allocation rates in randomized clinical trials. This article derives simple Monte Carlo, or nested Monte Carlo, methods that extend the use of EVSI calculations to medical decision applications with multiple sources of uncertainty, with particular attention to the form in which epidemiological data and research findings are structured. In particular, information on key decision parameters such as treatment efficacy are invariably available on measures of relative efficacy such as risk differences or odds ratios, but not on model parameters themselves. In addition, estimates of model parameters and of relative effect measures in the literature may be heterogeneous, reflecting additional sources of variation besides statistical sampling error. The authors describe Monte Carlo procedures for calculating EVSI for probability, rate, or continuous variable parameters in multi parameter decision models and approximate methods for relative measures such as risk differences, odds ratios, risk ratios, and hazard ratios. Where prior evidence is based on a random effects meta-analysis, the authors describe different ESVI calculations, one relevant for decisions concerning a specific patient group and the other for decisions concerning the entire population of patient groups. They also consider EVSI methods for new studies intended to update information on both baseline treatment efficacy and the relative efficacy of 2 treatments. Although there are restrictions regarding models with prior correlation between parameters, these methods can be applied to the majority of probabilistic decision models. Illustrative worked examples of EVSI calculations are given in an appendix.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0272989x04263162

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ades, A. E., Lu, G., & Claxton, K.
Affiliations
  • Medical Research Council (GB)
  • University of York (GB)
Venue
Medical Decision Making
Published
2004-03
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
207-227
ISSN
  • 0272-989X (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-681X
OpenAlex
W2069629877
Cited by
364
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 26
FWCI
41.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Decision Making (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
expected value of sample information, Monte Carlo methods, sensitivity analysis, treatment efficacy, risk difference, odds ratio, hazard ratio, random-effects meta-analysis, probabilistic decision model
MeSH terms
Algorithms, United Kingdom, Monte Carlo Method, Models, Statistical, Odds Ratio, Information Management, Decision Support Systems, Clinical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review