Cited by 135Lung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentCancer survivorship and careGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Anxiety, fear of cancer, and perceived risk of cancer following lung cancer screening

Byrne, Margaret M., Weissfeld, Joel, Roberts, Mark S.·2008·Medical Decision Making

Abstract

Background. Lung cancer screening can result in a high rate of indeterminate findings and has not yet been proven to be efficacious in reducing mortality. To date, the psychological consequences of receiving an indeterminate screening result are not known. Methods. Four hundred individuals were recruited into this study. Participants completed 4 surveys: baseline, after lung screening results were known, and at 6 and 12 mo after screening. Demographics, state/trait anxiety, fear of cancer, and perceived risk of lung cancer were measured. Mixed-model regressions were used to determine whether the levels and time trends of outcome variables were different among individuals with different screening outcomes. Results. An indeterminate screening result increased state anxiety of participants, although anxiety then decreased over time. The objective risk of cancer is lower for individuals with an indeterminate screen than their initial perceived risk, and screening did not change their perceived risk of cancer. Those with a suspicious screening result had increased perceived risk of cancer and fear of cancer after screening, and these effects also diminished over time. Individuals with a negative screen had a temporary reduction in perceived risk of cancer. Conclu sions. Individuals who are screened for lung cancer and receive an indeterminate or suspicious screening result have some negative psychological effects from being screened. The results suggest that individuals who are considering screening should be fully informed of the risk of negative psychosocial consequences and that individuals who have been screened should receive clear and detailed information on interpreting screening results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0272989x08322013

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • STAI has been used in breast, colon, and lung cancer screening programs and in patients with cirrhosis.

    “which has been used in breast, colon, and lung cancer screening programs24–26 and in patients with cirrhosis.27”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Byrne, M. M., Weissfeld, J., & Roberts, M. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Byrne, Margaret M.
Venue
Medical Decision Making
Published
2008-08-25
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
917-925
ISSN
  • 0272-989X (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-681X
OpenAlex
W2164472128
Cited by
135
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Decision Making (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (K07 CA10181)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
lung cancer screening, anxiety, fear of cancer, cancer risk perception, negative screening results, screening result interpretation, state anxiety
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Decision Making, Demography, Fear, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Regression Analysis, Smoking, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review