A Mathematical Approach for Evaluating Markov Models in Continuous Time without Discrete-Event Simulation
Abstract
Markov models are a simple and powerful tool for analyzing the health and economic effects of health care interventions. These models are usually evaluated in discrete time using cohort analysis. The use of discrete time assumes that changes in health states occur only at the end of a cycle period. Discrete-time Markov models only approximate the process of disease progression, as clinical events typically occur in continuous time. The approximation can yield biased cost-effectiveness estimates for Markov models with long cycle periods and if no half-cycle correction is made. The purpose of this article is to present an overview of methods for evaluating Markov models in continuous time. These methods use mathematical results from stochastic process theory and control theory. The methods are illustrated using an applied example on the cost-effectiveness of antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B. The main result is a mathematical solution for the expected time spent in each state in a continuous-time Markov model. It is shown how this solution can account for age-dependent transition rates and discounting of costs and health effects, and how the concept of tunnel states can be used to account for transition rates that depend on the time spent in a state. The applied example shows that the continuous-time model yields more accurate results than the discrete-time model but does not require much computation time and is easily implemented. In conclusion, continuous-time Markov…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The discretization of continuous-time dynamics in a discrete-time cSTM might introduce biases when estimating outcomes based on state occupancy.
“The discretization might introduce biases when estimating outcomes based on state occupancy.21”
From An Introductory Tutorial on Cohort State-Transition Models in R Using a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Example (2023) · cites this paper as [21]
Cites
Decision Making in Health and Medicine: Integrating Evidence and Values
Hunink, M. G. M., Weinstein, M. C., Wittenberg, E., Drummond, M. F., Pliskin, J. S., Wong, J. B., & Glasziou, P. P. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139506779 · Cited by 425 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Cohort analysis is a relatively simple technique that can often be done with a spreadsheet program.(4) Microsimulation is a flexible and increasingly popular alternative to cohort analysis, as this method can account for a patient’s history of prior events and can also be applied to disease processes that are too comp…”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Alarid-Escudero, F., Krijkamp, E., Enns, E. A., Yang, A., Hunink, M. G. M., Pechlivanoglou, P., & Jalal, H. (2023) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x221103163 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
“21 One approach to reducing these biases is to shorten the cycle length, requiring simulating the model for a larger number of cycles, which can be computationally burdensome.”
- Authors
- van Rosmalen, J., Toy, M., & O’Mahony, J. F.
- Affiliations
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (JVR, MT, JFO)
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Medical Decision Making
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-05-28
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 767-779
- ISSN
- 0272-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1552-681X
- OpenAlex
- W2038077792
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 5.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Decision Making (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Center for Translational Molecular Medicine
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Simulation Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Keywords
- continuous-time Markov model, discrete-time Markov model, cost-effectiveness analysis, discounting, chronic hepatitis B, antiviral therapy, stochastic process theory, control theory
- MeSH terms
- Markov Chains, Models, Theoretical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review