Cited by 425Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

Decision Making in Health and Medicine: Integrating Evidence and Values

Hunink, M. G. Myriam, Weinstein, Milton C., Wittenberg, Eve, Drummond, Michael F., Pliskin, Joseph S., Wong, John B., Glasziou, Paul P.·2014·Cambridge University Press eBooks

Abstract

Decision making in health care involves consideration of a complex set of diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic uncertainties. Medical therapies have side effects, surgical interventions may lead to complications, and diagnostic tests can produce misleading results. Furthermore, patient values and service costs must be considered. Decisions in clinical and health policy require careful weighing of risks and benefits and are commonly a trade-off of competing objectives: maximizing quality of life vs maximizing life expectancy vs minimizing the resources required. This text takes a proactive, systematic and rational approach to medical decision making. It covers decision trees, Bayesian revision, receiver operating characteristic curves, and cost-effectiveness analysis, as well as advanced topics such as Markov models, microsimulation, probabilistic sensitivity analysis and value of information analysis. It provides an essential resource for trainees and researchers involved in medical decision modelling, evidence-based medicine, clinical epidemiology, comparative effectiveness, public health, health economics, and health technology assessment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9781139506779

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hunink, M. G. M., Weinstein, M. C., Wittenberg, E., Drummond, M. F., Pliskin, J. S., Wong, J. B., & Glasziou, P. P.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of York (GB)
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Bond University (AU)
Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Published
2014-10-05
OpenAlex
W3023658191
Cited by
425
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
31.10
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
clinical decision-making, clinical decision analysis, decision tree, receiver operating characteristic, cost-effectiveness analysis, Markov model, microsimulation, probabilistic sensitivity analysis, value of information analysis, health policy, risk-benefit trade-off, diagnostic uncertainty, treatment side effects, health economics, health technology assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review